2011Technology and Health CareRequires access

The impact of seating forces from a cementless femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the femoral head – A cadaver study using μ-CT analysis

Matthias Lerch, Gavin Olender, Nina Angrisani, Dina Rittershaus, Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg, Fritz Thorey, Henning Windhagen, Christof Hurschler

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Recent studies have assumed micro-fractures of the femoral head during hip resurfacing arthroplasty as a possible reason for fractures at the implant/neck junction. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether implantation of a cementless femoral hip resurfacing component which requires high seating forces, causes micro-fractures of the femoral head. A cementless hip resurfacing femoral component was installed on 20 human, cadaveric femoral heads with an impaction device that generated 4.5 kilonewton force in one group and by hand in the other. Before and after impaction, the specimens were scanned with a μ-CT-System. The CT datasets were segmented and registered for detection of small trabecular fractures. The average percentage of shared voxels was 80.29% (standard deviation 3.24%). Change in bone structure after impaction (19.71%) was found on the surfaces of all samples. No formation that was ascribed to fracture was found. No difference between the specimens that were impacted by hand or by impaction device was noted. No fractures of the cancellous femoral head during installation of a cementless femoral THR component occurred. Cementless hip resurfacing might not increase the risk of fracturing the cancellous femoral head during implantation in a cadaveric μ-CT study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent studies have assumed micro-fractures of the femoral head during hip resurfacing arthroplasty as a possible reason for fractures at the implant/neck junction. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether implantation of a cementless femoral hip resurfacing component which requires high seating forces, causes micro-fractures of the femoral head. A cementless hip resurfacing femoral component was installed on 20 human, cadaveric femoral heads with an impaction device that generated 4.5 kilonewton force in one group and by hand in the other. Before and after impaction, the specimens were scanned with a μ-CT-System. The CT datasets were segmented and registered for detection of small trabecular fractures. The average percentage of shared voxels was 80.29% (standard deviation 3.24%). Change in bone structure after impaction (19.71%) was found on the surfaces of all samples. No formation that was ascribed to fracture was found. No difference between the specimens that were impacted by hand or by impaction device was noted. No fractures of the cancellous femoral head during installation of a cementless femoral THR component occurred. Cementless hip resurfacing might not increase the risk of fracturing the cancellous femoral head during implantation in a cadaveric μ-CT study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent studies have assumed micro-fractures of the femoral head during hip resurfacing arthroplasty as a possible reason for fractures at the implant/neck junction. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether implantation of a cementless femoral hip resurfacing component which requires high seating forces, causes micro-fractures of the femoral head. A cementless hip resurfacing femoral component was installed on 20 human, cadaveric femoral heads with an impaction device that generated 4.5 kilonewton force in one group and by hand in the other. Before and after impaction, the specimens were scanned with a μ-CT-System. The CT datasets were segmented and registered for detection of small trabecular fractures. The average percentage of shared voxels was 80.29% (standard deviation 3.24%). Change in bone structure after impaction (19.71%) was found on the surfaces of all samples. No formation that was ascribed to fracture was found. No difference between the specimens that were impacted by hand or by impaction device was noted. No fractures of the cancellous femoral head during installation of a cementless femoral THR component occurred. Cementless hip resurfacing might not increase the risk of fracturing the cancellous femoral head during implantation in a cadaveric μ-CT study.

Key concepts: Impaction, Femoral head, Cadaveric spasm, Medicine, Hip resurfacing, Cancellous bone, Cadaver, Arthroplasty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The impact of seating forces from a cementless femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the femoral head – A cadaver study using μ-CT analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens