2003International Journal of Public AdministrationRequires access

Hong Kong Regime Transformation at the Crossroads: From the Politics–Administration and Social Capital Perspectives

M. Jae Moon, Robert W. Gage

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

After Hong Kong returned to China, it experienced both subtle and significant changes in various arenas including its bureaucratic system, its politics, and in its civil society. These changes gradually lead to regime transformation. This article examines regime transformation in Hong Kong from two theoretical perspectives: politics–administration relations and state–civil society relations. Two cases which constitute salient issues today, the Right of Abode and the Falun Gong cases, were selected to illustrate the direction of Hong Kong regime transformation from both theoretical perspectives. The two cases suggest a possibility that Hong Kong might be gradually coming under more political/party influence from the Beijing government. They also suggest the institutionalization of a more centralized political system in Hong Kong, while it continues to maintain a relatively high level of social capital development with significant civil group activities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After Hong Kong returned to China, it experienced both subtle and significant changes in various arenas including its bureaucratic system, its politics, and in its civil society. These changes gradually lead to regime transformation. This article examines regime transformation in Hong Kong from two theoretical perspectives: politics–administration relations and state–civil society relations. Two cases which constitute salient issues today, the Right of Abode and the Falun Gong cases, were selected to illustrate the direction of Hong Kong regime transformation from both theoretical perspectives. The two cases suggest a possibility that Hong Kong might be gradually coming under more political/party influence from the Beijing government. They also suggest the institutionalization of a more centralized political system in Hong Kong, while it continues to maintain a relatively high level of social capital development with significant civil group activities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After Hong Kong returned to China, it experienced both subtle and significant changes in various arenas including its bureaucratic system, its politics, and in its civil society. These changes gradually lead to regime transformation. This article examines regime transformation in Hong Kong from two theoretical perspectives: politics–administration relations and state–civil society relations. Two cases which constitute salient issues today, the Right of Abode and the Falun Gong cases, were selected to illustrate the direction of Hong Kong regime transformation from both theoretical perspectives. The two cases suggest a possibility that Hong Kong might be gradually coming under more political/party influence from the Beijing government. They also suggest the institutionalization of a more centralized political system in Hong Kong, while it continues to maintain a relatively high level of social capital development with significant civil group activities.

Key concepts: Bureaucracy, Politics, Beijing, Institutionalisation, Administration (probate law), China, Capital (architecture), Social capital

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hong Kong Regime Transformation at the Crossroads: From the Politics–Administration and Social Capital Perspectives — Research Paper | ScholarLens