1997Acta Ophthalmologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Cataract surgery and pupil size in patients with diabetes mellitus

Anna J. Żaczek, Charlotta Zetterström

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Constriction of the pupil during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus was studied. METHODS: Before surgery a combination of 0.75% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine was applied topically to the eyes of 32 patients with diabetes mellitus and 25 age-matched controls. Epinephrine was mixed with buffered saline solution and used during the surgery. The surgical procedure included capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification in the posterior chamber and implantation into the capsular bag of a heparine surface-modified poly(methyl metacrylate) IOL with an optic diameter of 5.0 mm. The durations of phacoemulsification and the whole surgical procedure were recorded. Measurements of the horizontal pupillary diameter were taken before surgery, after phacoemulsification and at the end of the surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between controls and the diabetic group before the operation. Surgically induced miosis after phacoemulsification and at the end of operation were significantly more pronounced in the diabetic group than in controls (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). Phacoemulsification and the entire surgical procedure took significantly longer time when performed in the diabetic eyes (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that constriction of the pupil during cataract surgery is more pronounced in diabetic eyes as compared to controls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Constriction of the pupil during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus was studied. METHODS: Before surgery a combination of 0.75% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine was applied topically to the eyes of 32 patients with diabetes mellitus and 25 age-matched controls. Epinephrine was mixed with buffered saline solution and used during the surgery. The surgical procedure included capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification in the posterior chamber and implantation into the capsular bag of a heparine surface-modified poly(methyl metacrylate) IOL with an optic diameter of 5.0 mm. The durations of phacoemulsification and the whole surgical procedure were recorded. Measurements of the horizontal pupillary diameter were taken before surgery, after phacoemulsification and at the end of the surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between controls and the diabetic group before the operation. Surgically induced miosis after phacoemulsification and at the end of operation were significantly more pronounced in the diabetic group than in controls (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). Phacoemulsification and the entire surgical procedure took significantly longer time when performed in the diabetic eyes (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that constriction of the pupil during cataract surgery is more pronounced in diabetic eyes as compared to controls.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Constriction of the pupil during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus was studied. METHODS: Before surgery a combination of 0.75% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine was applied topically to the eyes of 32 patients with diabetes mellitus and 25 age-matched controls. Epinephrine was mixed with buffered saline solution and used during the surgery. The surgical procedure included capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification in the posterior chamber and implantation into the capsular bag of a heparine surface-modified poly(methyl metacrylate) IOL with an optic diameter of 5.0 mm. The durations of phacoemulsification and the whole surgical procedure were recorded. Measurements of the horizontal pupillary diameter were taken before surgery, after phacoemulsification and at the end of the surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between controls and the diabetic group before the operation. Surgically induced miosis after phacoemulsification and at the end of operation were significantly more pronounced in the diabetic group than in controls (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). Phacoemulsification and the entire surgical procedure took significantly longer time when performed in the diabetic eyes (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that constriction of the pupil during cataract surgery is more pronounced in diabetic eyes as compared to controls.

Key concepts: Medicine, Phacoemulsification, Miosis, Cataract surgery, Diabetes mellitus, Ophthalmology, Pupil, Intraocular lens

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cataract surgery and pupil size in patients with diabetes mellitus — Research Paper | ScholarLens