Workload When Using a Mouse as an Input Device
Arne Aarås, Ola Ro
Abstract
Arne Aarås, Ola Ro
Abstract
A newly developed mouse, which seemed to give the operator a more neutral forearm position was compared with a traditional mouse. The muscle load was recorded by electromyography from the extensor digitorum communis, extensor carpi ulnaris, and trapezius muscles. The muscle load of the forearm was significantly less when using the new mouse compared with the traditional one. This was true for the extensor digitorum communis regarding the static (p = .0005) and the median (p = .001) values of the amplitude distribution function (ADF) and the number of periods per minute when the muscle load was below 1% of maximum voluntary contraction (p = .03). The same dear tendency was also found regarding the static muscle load from the extensor carpi ulnaris (p = .06). These results indicate the need for reducing the pronation of the forearm when, working with a mouse.
OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A newly developed mouse, which seemed to give the operator a more neutral forearm position was compared with a traditional mouse. The muscle load was recorded by electromyography from the extensor digitorum communis, extensor carpi ulnaris, and trapezius muscles. The muscle load of the forearm was significantly less when using the new mouse compared with the traditional one. This was true for the extensor digitorum communis regarding the static (p = .0005) and the median (p = .001) values of the amplitude distribution function (ADF) and the number of periods per minute when the muscle load was below 1% of maximum voluntary contraction (p = .03). The same dear tendency was also found regarding the static muscle load from the extensor carpi ulnaris (p = .06). These results indicate the need for reducing the pronation of the forearm when, working with a mouse.
Key concepts: Extensor Digitorum Communis, Extensor Carpi Ulnaris, Forearm, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Wrist, Anatomy, Electromyography, Workload