2014Muscle & NerveRequires access

Analysis of crosstalk in the mechanomyographic signals generated by forearm muscles during different wrist postures

Md. Anamul Islam, Kenneth Sundaraj, R. Badlishah Ahmad, Sebastian Sundaraj, Nizam Uddin Ahamed, Md. Asraf Ali

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we analyzed the crosstalk in mechanomyographic (MMG) signals generated by the extensor digitorum (ED), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscles of the forearm during wrist flexion (WF) and extension (WE) and radial (RD) and ulnar (UD) deviations. METHODS: Twenty right-handed men (mean ± SD age=26.7 ± 3.83 years) performed the wrist postures. During each wrist posture, MMG signals were detected using 3 accelerometers. Peak cross-correlations were used to quantify crosstalk. RESULTS: The level of crosstalk ranged from 1.69 to 64.05%. The wrist postures except the RD did not influence the crosstalk significantly between muscle pairs. However, muscles of the forearm compartments influenced the level of crosstalk for each wrist posture significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be used to improve our understanding of the mechanics of the forearm muscles during wrist postures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we analyzed the crosstalk in mechanomyographic (MMG) signals generated by the extensor digitorum (ED), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscles of the forearm during wrist flexion (WF) and extension (WE) and radial (RD) and ulnar (UD) deviations. METHODS: Twenty right-handed men (mean ± SD age=26.7 ± 3.83 years) performed the wrist postures. During each wrist posture, MMG signals were detected using 3 accelerometers. Peak cross-correlations were used to quantify crosstalk. RESULTS: The level of crosstalk ranged from 1.69 to 64.05%. The wrist postures except the RD did not influence the crosstalk significantly between muscle pairs. However, muscles of the forearm compartments influenced the level of crosstalk for each wrist posture significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be used to improve our understanding of the mechanics of the forearm muscles during wrist postures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we analyzed the crosstalk in mechanomyographic (MMG) signals generated by the extensor digitorum (ED), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscles of the forearm during wrist flexion (WF) and extension (WE) and radial (RD) and ulnar (UD) deviations. METHODS: Twenty right-handed men (mean ± SD age=26.7 ± 3.83 years) performed the wrist postures. During each wrist posture, MMG signals were detected using 3 accelerometers. Peak cross-correlations were used to quantify crosstalk. RESULTS: The level of crosstalk ranged from 1.69 to 64.05%. The wrist postures except the RD did not influence the crosstalk significantly between muscle pairs. However, muscles of the forearm compartments influenced the level of crosstalk for each wrist posture significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be used to improve our understanding of the mechanics of the forearm muscles during wrist postures.

Key concepts: Wrist, Forearm, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Extensor Carpi Ulnaris, Anatomy, Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Ulnar nerve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of crosstalk in the mechanomyographic signals generated by forearm muscles during different wrist postures — Research Paper | ScholarLens