2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Hyperlink of Men

Ricardo Kawase, Patrick Siehndel, Eelco Herder, Wolfgang Nejdl

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Hand-made hyperlinks are increasingly outnumbered by automatically generated links, which are usually based on text similarity or some sort of recommendation algorithm. In this paper we explore the current linking and appreciation of automatically generated links. To what extent do they prevail on the Web, in what forms do they appear, and do users think those generated links are just as good as human-created links? To answer these questions we first propose a model for extracting contextual information of a hyperlink. Second, we developed a hyperlink ranker to assigned relevance to each existing human generated link. With the outcomes of the hyperlink ranker, together with another two recommendation strategies, we performed a user study with over 100 participants. Results indicate that automated links are "good enough", and even preferred in some user contexts. Still, they do not provide the deeper knowledge as expressed by human authors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hand-made hyperlinks are increasingly outnumbered by automatically generated links, which are usually based on text similarity or some sort of recommendation algorithm. In this paper we explore the current linking and appreciation of automatically generated links. To what extent do they prevail on the Web, in what forms do they appear, and do users think those generated links are just as good as human-created links? To answer these questions we first propose a model for extracting contextual information of a hyperlink. Second, we developed a hyperlink ranker to assigned relevance to each existing human generated link. With the outcomes of the hyperlink ranker, together with another two recommendation strategies, we performed a user study with over 100 participants. Results indicate that automated links are "good enough", and even preferred in some user contexts. Still, they do not provide the deeper knowledge as expressed by human authors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hand-made hyperlinks are increasingly outnumbered by automatically generated links, which are usually based on text similarity or some sort of recommendation algorithm. In this paper we explore the current linking and appreciation of automatically generated links. To what extent do they prevail on the Web, in what forms do they appear, and do users think those generated links are just as good as human-created links? To answer these questions we first propose a model for extracting contextual information of a hyperlink. Second, we developed a hyperlink ranker to assigned relevance to each existing human generated link. With the outcomes of the hyperlink ranker, together with another two recommendation strategies, we performed a user study with over 100 participants. Results indicate that automated links are "good enough", and even preferred in some user contexts. Still, they do not provide the deeper knowledge as expressed by human authors.

Key concepts: Hyperlink, Computer science, Relevance (law), Similarity (geometry), Information retrieval, World Wide Web, Link (geometry), Link analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hyperlink of Men — Research Paper | ScholarLens