2016Unpublished venueRequires access

To link or not to link: Ranking hyperlinks in Wikipedia using collective attention

Philip Thruesen, Jaroslav Čechák, Blandine Seznec, Roel Castaño, Nattiya Kanhabua

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Wikipedia is one of the fastest growing websites and a primary source of knowledge on the Internet. Being a wiki, its content is crowd-sourced by the users. This has many benefits and it is one of the main reasons it has grown to reach more than 5 million articles in its English version. Nevertheless, this also raises issues, like the overlinking of articles, which are difficult to deal with by editors. In this paper, we tackle overlinking in Wikipedia as a ranking problem. We apply Learning to Rank algorithms to evaluate the click frequency of links in an effort to distinguish the most useful links for users. To accomplish this, we develop a ground truth, which serves as baseline for our algorithm and compare hyperlink features to implement the most advantageous ones. The results show 86.2% accuracy with the top-6 most useful features and 87.7% accuracy with the complete feature set. Considering these results, we outline a solution to the overlinking problem. By removing the most inadequate links, we suggest that readability of Wikipedia articles could be improved while preserving most of its useful links.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wikipedia is one of the fastest growing websites and a primary source of knowledge on the Internet. Being a wiki, its content is crowd-sourced by the users. This has many benefits and it is one of the main reasons it has grown to reach more than 5 million articles in its English version. Nevertheless, this also raises issues, like the overlinking of articles, which are difficult to deal with by editors. In this paper, we tackle overlinking in Wikipedia as a ranking problem. We apply Learning to Rank algorithms to evaluate the click frequency of links in an effort to distinguish the most useful links for users. To accomplish this, we develop a ground truth, which serves as baseline for our algorithm and compare hyperlink features to implement the most advantageous ones. The results show 86.2% accuracy with the top-6 most useful features and 87.7% accuracy with the complete feature set. Considering these results, we outline a solution to the overlinking problem. By removing the most inadequate links, we suggest that readability of Wikipedia articles could be improved while preserving most of its useful links.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wikipedia is one of the fastest growing websites and a primary source of knowledge on the Internet. Being a wiki, its content is crowd-sourced by the users. This has many benefits and it is one of the main reasons it has grown to reach more than 5 million articles in its English version. Nevertheless, this also raises issues, like the overlinking of articles, which are difficult to deal with by editors. In this paper, we tackle overlinking in Wikipedia as a ranking problem. We apply Learning to Rank algorithms to evaluate the click frequency of links in an effort to distinguish the most useful links for users. To accomplish this, we develop a ground truth, which serves as baseline for our algorithm and compare hyperlink features to implement the most advantageous ones. The results show 86.2% accuracy with the top-6 most useful features and 87.7% accuracy with the complete feature set. Considering these results, we outline a solution to the overlinking problem. By removing the most inadequate links, we suggest that readability of Wikipedia articles could be improved while preserving most of its useful links.

Key concepts: Hyperlink, Computer science, Readability, Link analysis, Ranking (information retrieval), Link (geometry), Baseline (sea), Information retrieval

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
To link or not to link: Ranking hyperlinks in Wikipedia using collective attention — Research Paper | ScholarLens