1984JAMARequires access

Expert Witness for Whom?

George D. Lundberg

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Expert witness for the prosecution? Expert witness for the defense? Expert witness for the court? How about unbiased expert witness for the truth? Elsewhere in this issue, Goldsmith1,2describes in two MEDICAL NEWS stories the evolving opinion pertaining to the practice of being an expert witness, with particular emphasis on forensic psychiatry, morality, ethics, and law. As the litigious elements of our society have flourished, some components have grown relatively unnoticed. Among these have been the so-called friction costs attendant to litigation before and during a trial. One such by-product has been a burgeoning medical expert consultant and witness business. Our legal adversary system flourishes both as a tradition and as an expression of the aggressive nature of our society. In contrast to some other societies, advocates here have both the opportunity and responsibility of presenting the best possible case for their side, often using expert consultation and witnesses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Expert witness for the prosecution? Expert witness for the defense? Expert witness for the court? How about unbiased expert witness for the truth? Elsewhere in this issue, Goldsmith1,2describes in two MEDICAL NEWS stories the evolving opinion pertaining to the practice of being an expert witness, with particular emphasis on forensic psychiatry, morality, ethics, and law. As the litigious elements of our society have flourished, some components have grown relatively unnoticed. Among these have been the so-called friction costs attendant to litigation before and during a trial. One such by-product has been a burgeoning medical expert consultant and witness business. Our legal adversary system flourishes both as a tradition and as an expression of the aggressive nature of our society. In contrast to some other societies, advocates here have both the opportunity and responsibility of presenting the best possible case for their side, often using expert consultation and witnesses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Expert witness for the prosecution? Expert witness for the defense? Expert witness for the court? How about unbiased expert witness for the truth? Elsewhere in this issue, Goldsmith1,2describes in two MEDICAL NEWS stories the evolving opinion pertaining to the practice of being an expert witness, with particular emphasis on forensic psychiatry, morality, ethics, and law. As the litigious elements of our society have flourished, some components have grown relatively unnoticed. Among these have been the so-called friction costs attendant to litigation before and during a trial. One such by-product has been a burgeoning medical expert consultant and witness business. Our legal adversary system flourishes both as a tradition and as an expression of the aggressive nature of our society. In contrast to some other societies, advocates here have both the opportunity and responsibility of presenting the best possible case for their side, often using expert consultation and witnesses.

Key concepts: Witness, Expert witness, Forensic psychology, Medicine, Law, Adversary, Engineering ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expert Witness for Whom? — Research Paper | ScholarLens