1989The Elementary School JournalRequires access

Defining and Describing Whole Language

Dorothy J. Watson

Open publisher page 108 citations

Abstract

On February 18, 1989, the constitution of the Whole Language Umbrella, a confederation of whole-language support groups and individuals, was ratified in Winnipeg. This international organization is built on the beliefs and practices of whole-language learning and teaching. Such a powerful international educational force as whole language must be defined and described both for advocates and detractors. This article not only points out why the term needs to be defined but also why it is sometimes difficult to do so. Some educators' definitions of whole language are presented as a preface to my evolving definition. Although there is no such thing as an archetypical whole-language classroom, certain experiences consistently appear in whole-language learning communities: for example, reading of untampered texts, telling stories, student-generated writing, making personal and social connections to meaning, student choice and responsibility for learning, acceptance of errors, and always an emphasis on meaning. Such characteristic learning engagements are described along with some of the theoretical beliefs that support them. Finally, the question "Is it worth the effort?" is answered by a young language learner named Patty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On February 18, 1989, the constitution of the Whole Language Umbrella, a confederation of whole-language support groups and individuals, was ratified in Winnipeg. This international organization is built on the beliefs and practices of whole-language learning and teaching. Such a powerful international educational force as whole language must be defined and described both for advocates and detractors. This article not only points out why the term needs to be defined but also why it is sometimes difficult to do so. Some educators' definitions of whole language are presented as a preface to my evolving definition. Although there is no such thing as an archetypical whole-language classroom, certain experiences consistently appear in whole-language learning communities: for example, reading of untampered texts, telling stories, student-generated writing, making personal and social connections to meaning, student choice and responsibility for learning, acceptance of errors, and always an emphasis on meaning. Such characteristic learning engagements are described along with some of the theoretical beliefs that support them. Finally, the question "Is it worth the effort?" is answered by a young language learner named Patty.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 108 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On February 18, 1989, the constitution of the Whole Language Umbrella, a confederation of whole-language support groups and individuals, was ratified in Winnipeg. This international organization is built on the beliefs and practices of whole-language learning and teaching. Such a powerful international educational force as whole language must be defined and described both for advocates and detractors. This article not only points out why the term needs to be defined but also why it is sometimes difficult to do so. Some educators' definitions of whole language are presented as a preface to my evolving definition. Although there is no such thing as an archetypical whole-language classroom, certain experiences consistently appear in whole-language learning communities: for example, reading of untampered texts, telling stories, student-generated writing, making personal and social connections to meaning, student choice and responsibility for learning, acceptance of errors, and always an emphasis on meaning. Such characteristic learning engagements are described along with some of the theoretical beliefs that support them. Finally, the question "Is it worth the effort?" is answered by a young language learner named Patty.

Key concepts: Whole language, Meaning (existential), Reading (process), Constitution, Comprehension approach, Language assessment, Linguistics, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Defining and Describing Whole Language — Research Paper | ScholarLens