1995Transactions of the ASAERequires access

Riprap Design for Pipe Spillway Outlets 1.0 = TW/Do = 0.7

Charles E. Rice, Kem C. Kadavy

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop criteria to determine the geometry of riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways with tailwater elevations in the range of 1.0 pipe diameter below to 0.7 pipe diameter above the outlet invert elevation. Dimensionless relationships were developed to determine the dimensions of plunge pool and riprap size required for stability using a laboratory-scaled physical model with the following test conditions: pipe diameter (Do; 0.0628 and 0.0884 m); tailwater elevations (TW/Do; 0.7, 0.5, 0.25, 0.0, and 1.0); riprap sizes (0.127 = D50/Do = 0.707); downstream channel bed elevations (Z/Do; 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0); and flows varying from 0.0 to 11.5 Q2/gDo5. Example design problems are presented to illustrate use of the recommended design procedure. The design equations will result in stable riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways at 1.0 = TW/Do = 0.7 over a wide range of flow conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was conducted to develop criteria to determine the geometry of riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways with tailwater elevations in the range of 1.0 pipe diameter below to 0.7 pipe diameter above the outlet invert elevation. Dimensionless relationships were developed to determine the dimensions of plunge pool and riprap size required for stability using a laboratory-scaled physical model with the following test conditions: pipe diameter (Do; 0.0628 and 0.0884 m); tailwater elevations (TW/Do; 0.7, 0.5, 0.25, 0.0, and 1.0); riprap sizes (0.127 = D50/Do = 0.707); downstream channel bed elevations (Z/Do; 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0); and flows varying from 0.0 to 11.5 Q2/gDo5. Example design problems are presented to illustrate use of the recommended design procedure. The design equations will result in stable riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways at 1.0 = TW/Do = 0.7 over a wide range of flow conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was conducted to develop criteria to determine the geometry of riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways with tailwater elevations in the range of 1.0 pipe diameter below to 0.7 pipe diameter above the outlet invert elevation. Dimensionless relationships were developed to determine the dimensions of plunge pool and riprap size required for stability using a laboratory-scaled physical model with the following test conditions: pipe diameter (Do; 0.0628 and 0.0884 m); tailwater elevations (TW/Do; 0.7, 0.5, 0.25, 0.0, and 1.0); riprap sizes (0.127 = D50/Do = 0.707); downstream channel bed elevations (Z/Do; 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0); and flows varying from 0.0 to 11.5 Q2/gDo5. Example design problems are presented to illustrate use of the recommended design procedure. The design equations will result in stable riprap-lined plunge pools downstream of pipe spillways at 1.0 = TW/Do = 0.7 over a wide range of flow conditions.

Key concepts: Tailwater, Riprap, Spillway, Dimensionless quantity, Geotechnical engineering, Geology, Flow (mathematics), Range (aeronautics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Riprap Design for Pipe Spillway Outlets 1.0 = TW/Do = 0.7 — Research Paper | ScholarLens