1969This Digital Resource was created from scans of the Print ResourceRequires access

Low-Water Weirs on Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon, and Big and Colewa Creeks, Arkansas and Louisana; Hydraulic Model Investigation.

Jackson H. Ables, Marden B. Boyd

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : A 1:20-scale model reproducing one-half of the channel section through a low-water weir was used to test eight plans of channel improvement. The tests were conducted with a drop height of 5.5 ft, and discharges up to 10,000 cfs were observed. Flow conditions and slope protection downstream from the weir to control the flanking problem were found to be satisfactory with channel improvement plans 6 and 8. Riprap with an average weight of 33 lb was used in slope protection in both plans. A model headwater-tailwater rating curve was obtained. A second 1:20-scale section model was constructed in a 2.5-ft-wide glass flume for more generalized riprap tests in the vicinity of the structure. Several drop structure plans were observed to develop an effective, economical drop structure. Of primary concern were development of some of the dimensions of various elements of the structure and determination of riprap requirements in the vicinity of the structure. Limiting tailwater curves for 220- and 325-lb riprap are furnished as a guide in riprap selection at drop structures with drop heights of from 5 to 10 ft. Suggestions as to the use of these curves also are included. A basin length of 20 ft is considered to be adequate at projects where the jet will ride through at unit discharges exceeding about 10 cfs. A riprap plan which provides additional protection to the structure is presented in Appendix A. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : A 1:20-scale model reproducing one-half of the channel section through a low-water weir was used to test eight plans of channel improvement. The tests were conducted with a drop height of 5.5 ft, and discharges up to 10,000 cfs were observed. Flow conditions and slope protection downstream from the weir to control the flanking problem were found to be satisfactory with channel improvement plans 6 and 8. Riprap with an average weight of 33 lb was used in slope protection in both plans. A model headwater-tailwater rating curve was obtained. A second 1:20-scale section model was constructed in a 2.5-ft-wide glass flume for more generalized riprap tests in the vicinity of the structure. Several drop structure plans were observed to develop an effective, economical drop structure. Of primary concern were development of some of the dimensions of various elements of the structure and determination of riprap requirements in the vicinity of the structure. Limiting tailwater curves for 220- and 325-lb riprap are furnished as a guide in riprap selection at drop structures with drop heights of from 5 to 10 ft. Suggestions as to the use of these curves also are included. A basin length of 20 ft is considered to be adequate at projects where the jet will ride through at unit discharges exceeding about 10 cfs. A riprap plan which provides additional protection to the structure is presented in Appendix A. (Author)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : A 1:20-scale model reproducing one-half of the channel section through a low-water weir was used to test eight plans of channel improvement. The tests were conducted with a drop height of 5.5 ft, and discharges up to 10,000 cfs were observed. Flow conditions and slope protection downstream from the weir to control the flanking problem were found to be satisfactory with channel improvement plans 6 and 8. Riprap with an average weight of 33 lb was used in slope protection in both plans. A model headwater-tailwater rating curve was obtained. A second 1:20-scale section model was constructed in a 2.5-ft-wide glass flume for more generalized riprap tests in the vicinity of the structure. Several drop structure plans were observed to develop an effective, economical drop structure. Of primary concern were development of some of the dimensions of various elements of the structure and determination of riprap requirements in the vicinity of the structure. Limiting tailwater curves for 220- and 325-lb riprap are furnished as a guide in riprap selection at drop structures with drop heights of from 5 to 10 ft. Suggestions as to the use of these curves also are included. A basin length of 20 ft is considered to be adequate at projects where the jet will ride through at unit discharges exceeding about 10 cfs. A riprap plan which provides additional protection to the structure is presented in Appendix A. (Author)

Key concepts: Riprap, Tailwater, Flume, Weir, Hydraulic structure, Drop (telecommunication), Geotechnical engineering, Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Low-Water Weirs on Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon, and Big and Colewa Creeks, Arkansas and Louisana; Hydraulic Model Investigation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens