1994Florida EntomologistOpen access

Consumption of Methyl Eugenol by Male Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae): Low Incidence of Repeat Feeding

Todd E. Shelly

Open full text 42 citations

Abstract

The tendency of male Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to re-visit a methyl eugenol source following initial exposure was examined. The first field test investigated the effect of duration of exposure on subsequent capture probability. “Treated” males were allowed to feed on methyl eugenol for 30 s or had access to methyl eugenol for 1 h, 4 h, or 24 h immediately prior to release. Capture probabilities (1%-4%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (22%) recorded for “control” (unexposed) males. In a second field test, treated males were released 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after an initial exposure (2 h) to methyl eugenol. Capture probabilities (11%-18%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (34%) recorded for control males. Laboratory tests yielded similar results as both the incidence and duration of re-feeding on methyl eugenol were uniformly low for males held 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after their initial exposure. By exposing sterile males to the lure prior to release, it may be possible to combine programs of male annihilation and sterile insect release. The present findings also suggest that the effectiveness of male annihilation efforts may be reduced in areas where wild males have consumed sufficient amounts of methyl eugenol from natural sources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The tendency of male Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to re-visit a methyl eugenol source following initial exposure was examined. The first field test investigated the effect of duration of exposure on subsequent capture probability. “Treated” males were allowed to feed on methyl eugenol for 30 s or had access to methyl eugenol for 1 h, 4 h, or 24 h immediately prior to release. Capture probabilities (1%-4%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (22%) recorded for “control” (unexposed) males. In a second field test, treated males were released 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after an initial exposure (2 h) to methyl eugenol. Capture probabilities (11%-18%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (34%) recorded for control males. Laboratory tests yielded similar results as both the incidence and duration of re-feeding on methyl eugenol were uniformly low for males held 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after their initial exposure. By exposing sterile males to the lure prior to release, it may be possible to combine programs of male annihilation and sterile insect release. The present findings also suggest that the effectiveness of male annihilation efforts may be reduced in areas where wild males have consumed sufficient amounts of methyl eugenol from natural sources.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The tendency of male Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to re-visit a methyl eugenol source following initial exposure was examined. The first field test investigated the effect of duration of exposure on subsequent capture probability. “Treated” males were allowed to feed on methyl eugenol for 30 s or had access to methyl eugenol for 1 h, 4 h, or 24 h immediately prior to release. Capture probabilities (1%-4%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (22%) recorded for “control” (unexposed) males. In a second field test, treated males were released 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after an initial exposure (2 h) to methyl eugenol. Capture probabilities (11%-18%) did not differ significantly among the different treatments but were significantly below that (34%) recorded for control males. Laboratory tests yielded similar results as both the incidence and duration of re-feeding on methyl eugenol were uniformly low for males held 7 d, 21 d, or 35 d after their initial exposure. By exposing sterile males to the lure prior to release, it may be possible to combine programs of male annihilation and sterile insect release. The present findings also suggest that the effectiveness of male annihilation efforts may be reduced in areas where wild males have consumed sufficient amounts of methyl eugenol from natural sources.

Key concepts: Tephritidae, Methyl eugenol, Bactrocera dorsalis, Biology, Incidence (geometry), Toxicology, Horticulture, PEST analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consumption of Methyl Eugenol by Male Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae): Low Incidence of Repeat Feeding — Research Paper | ScholarLens