A comparative study of four reading journals' contributions to comprehension instruction methodology
Maria A. Ceprano, Celia Stabile
Abstract
Maria A. Ceprano, Celia Stabile
Abstract
This study analyzed and compared the content of four reading journals for the years 1973 and 1983 on eight categories of comprehension instruction and three categories of comprehension follow up. Of specific interest was the extent to which articles concretely described strategies for teaching comprehension or for following up on comprehension instruction according to specified definitions for each category. In general, results indicated an increase in the number of articles focusing on comprehension issues and practices.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study analyzed and compared the content of four reading journals for the years 1973 and 1983 on eight categories of comprehension instruction and three categories of comprehension follow up. Of specific interest was the extent to which articles concretely described strategies for teaching comprehension or for following up on comprehension instruction according to specified definitions for each category. In general, results indicated an increase in the number of articles focusing on comprehension issues and practices.
Key concepts: Reading comprehension, Comprehension, Psychology, Mathematics education, Reciprocal teaching, Reading (process), Linguistics, Philosophy