1996Parasite ImmunologyRequires access

Protection of rats against malaria by a transplanted immune spleen

L Favila‐Castillo, Amalia Monroy-Ostria, Eiji Kobayashi, CHAKRIT HIRUNPETCHARA T, NAOSHI KAMADA, Michael F. Good

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

A number of reports have suggested that the spleen plays a key role in the regulation of immunity to malaria but the role, if any, of other tissues is less clear. Furthermore, numerous functional changes occur in the spleen following malaria infection and it is not known whether the spleen's role relates primarily to its content of malaria-specific lymphocytes or to the altered structure and function that has occurred. To address these issues we have generated splenic chimeras by transplanting spleens between Plasmodium berghei-immune and naive rats. In the absence of a functional spleen, specific immune responses from both isolated splenic and non-splenic cells can partially control infection. However, an immune spleen in a naive rat can solidly protect the animal from malaria and a normal spleen in an otherwise immune rat can provide enhanced protection over the non-splenic state. Thus, in the presence of functional splenic architecture both splenic and non-splenic malaria-specific lymphocytes operate more effectively. However, these studies do demonstrate an important role for non-splenic tissue in immunity at least for P. berghei in the rat. The study could have important implications for induction of protective immune responses by vaccination and suggests that malaria-specific lymphocyte responses induced in the periphery following vaccination could interact with parasites in both spleen-dependent and spleen-independent ways.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of reports have suggested that the spleen plays a key role in the regulation of immunity to malaria but the role, if any, of other tissues is less clear. Furthermore, numerous functional changes occur in the spleen following malaria infection and it is not known whether the spleen's role relates primarily to its content of malaria-specific lymphocytes or to the altered structure and function that has occurred. To address these issues we have generated splenic chimeras by transplanting spleens between Plasmodium berghei-immune and naive rats. In the absence of a functional spleen, specific immune responses from both isolated splenic and non-splenic cells can partially control infection. However, an immune spleen in a naive rat can solidly protect the animal from malaria and a normal spleen in an otherwise immune rat can provide enhanced protection over the non-splenic state. Thus, in the presence of functional splenic architecture both splenic and non-splenic malaria-specific lymphocytes operate more effectively. However, these studies do demonstrate an important role for non-splenic tissue in immunity at least for P. berghei in the rat. The study could have important implications for induction of protective immune responses by vaccination and suggests that malaria-specific lymphocyte responses induced in the periphery following vaccination could interact with parasites in both spleen-dependent and spleen-independent ways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of reports have suggested that the spleen plays a key role in the regulation of immunity to malaria but the role, if any, of other tissues is less clear. Furthermore, numerous functional changes occur in the spleen following malaria infection and it is not known whether the spleen's role relates primarily to its content of malaria-specific lymphocytes or to the altered structure and function that has occurred. To address these issues we have generated splenic chimeras by transplanting spleens between Plasmodium berghei-immune and naive rats. In the absence of a functional spleen, specific immune responses from both isolated splenic and non-splenic cells can partially control infection. However, an immune spleen in a naive rat can solidly protect the animal from malaria and a normal spleen in an otherwise immune rat can provide enhanced protection over the non-splenic state. Thus, in the presence of functional splenic architecture both splenic and non-splenic malaria-specific lymphocytes operate more effectively. However, these studies do demonstrate an important role for non-splenic tissue in immunity at least for P. berghei in the rat. The study could have important implications for induction of protective immune responses by vaccination and suggests that malaria-specific lymphocyte responses induced in the periphery following vaccination could interact with parasites in both spleen-dependent and spleen-independent ways.

Key concepts: Spleen, Plasmodium berghei, Immune system, Malaria, Immunology, Biology, Immunity, Lymphocyte

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protection of rats against malaria by a transplanted immune spleen — Research Paper | ScholarLens