1996•European EducationRequires access

The Educational Status of the Natural Science Subjects

Max Liedtke

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The division of the sciences into "human sciences" and "natural sciences" is perhaps one of the richest in its implications and at the same time one of the most erroneous constructs in the history of science. The existing classification of disciplines includes all disciplines that have to do with objects and lawful processes in animate and inanimate nature as "natural sciences." However, this ascription, which in fact also places mathematics among the natural sciences—although it ought to be regarded as belonging on the inner territory of the "human sciences" since it is a pure product of human cognitive capacities (compare the customary placing of mathematics in the natural science departments in the universities)—is, like everything else we think and observe, a result of a historical process. Nor is truth guaranteed by referring to historical processes, however venerable they might be. Historical processes are always also marked by many chance occurrences and errors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The division of the sciences into "human sciences" and "natural sciences" is perhaps one of the richest in its implications and at the same time one of the most erroneous constructs in the history of science. The existing classification of disciplines includes all disciplines that have to do with objects and lawful processes in animate and inanimate nature as "natural sciences." However, this ascription, which in fact also places mathematics among the natural sciences—although it ought to be regarded as belonging on the inner territory of the "human sciences" since it is a pure product of human cognitive capacities (compare the customary placing of mathematics in the natural science departments in the universities)—is, like everything else we think and observe, a result of a historical process. Nor is truth guaranteed by referring to historical processes, however venerable they might be. Historical processes are always also marked by many chance occurrences and errors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The division of the sciences into "human sciences" and "natural sciences" is perhaps one of the richest in its implications and at the same time one of the most erroneous constructs in the history of science. The existing classification of disciplines includes all disciplines that have to do with objects and lawful processes in animate and inanimate nature as "natural sciences." However, this ascription, which in fact also places mathematics among the natural sciences—although it ought to be regarded as belonging on the inner territory of the "human sciences" since it is a pure product of human cognitive capacities (compare the customary placing of mathematics in the natural science departments in the universities)—is, like everything else we think and observe, a result of a historical process. Nor is truth guaranteed by referring to historical processes, however venerable they might be. Historical processes are always also marked by many chance occurrences and errors.

Key concepts: Human science, Natural science, Natural (archaeology), Epistemology, Ascription, Social science, Behavioural sciences, History of science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Educational Status of the Natural Science Subjects — Research Paper | ScholarLens