1972Crop ScienceRequires access

Photoperiod and Temperature Manipulation Induces Early Anthesis in Pearl Millet1

Henry Hellmers, Glenn W. Burton

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The time requited for anthesis and head development by two inbred lines of pearl millet, Pennisetum typhoides (Burm, Staph, and C. E. Hubb), Tift‐23 and Tift‐31 was shortened by manipulating temperature and photoperiod regimes. Growth and development rates over a range of temperatures and photoperiods were determined using the controlled environment facilities in the Phytotron at Duke University. These studies showed that high day and night temperatures of 32 and 29 C, combined with long days (16 hours) of high light intensity, favored growth and that early flowering could be induced with 8‐hr days. Early anthesis and full head development were attained using 32‐C day with 29‐C night temperatures and the following photoperiod sequences: 21 days with a long photoperiod, 16 hrs; then 15 days with a short photoperiod, 8 hr; followed again by long days. This procedure resulted in anthesis in 45 to 48 days from date of planting, compared to previously reported times of 56 to 67 days.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The time requited for anthesis and head development by two inbred lines of pearl millet, Pennisetum typhoides (Burm, Staph, and C. E. Hubb), Tift‐23 and Tift‐31 was shortened by manipulating temperature and photoperiod regimes. Growth and development rates over a range of temperatures and photoperiods were determined using the controlled environment facilities in the Phytotron at Duke University. These studies showed that high day and night temperatures of 32 and 29 C, combined with long days (16 hours) of high light intensity, favored growth and that early flowering could be induced with 8‐hr days. Early anthesis and full head development were attained using 32‐C day with 29‐C night temperatures and the following photoperiod sequences: 21 days with a long photoperiod, 16 hrs; then 15 days with a short photoperiod, 8 hr; followed again by long days. This procedure resulted in anthesis in 45 to 48 days from date of planting, compared to previously reported times of 56 to 67 days.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The time requited for anthesis and head development by two inbred lines of pearl millet, Pennisetum typhoides (Burm, Staph, and C. E. Hubb), Tift‐23 and Tift‐31 was shortened by manipulating temperature and photoperiod regimes. Growth and development rates over a range of temperatures and photoperiods were determined using the controlled environment facilities in the Phytotron at Duke University. These studies showed that high day and night temperatures of 32 and 29 C, combined with long days (16 hours) of high light intensity, favored growth and that early flowering could be induced with 8‐hr days. Early anthesis and full head development were attained using 32‐C day with 29‐C night temperatures and the following photoperiod sequences: 21 days with a long photoperiod, 16 hrs; then 15 days with a short photoperiod, 8 hr; followed again by long days. This procedure resulted in anthesis in 45 to 48 days from date of planting, compared to previously reported times of 56 to 67 days.

Key concepts: Anthesis, photoperiodism, Biology, Phytotron, Pennisetum, Horticulture, Sowing, Pearl

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Photoperiod and Temperature Manipulation Induces Early Anthesis in Pearl Millet1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens