Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock: the TERLIVAP study
Andrea Morelli, Christian Ertmer, Matthias Lange, Alessandra Orecchioni, Sebastian Rehberg, P Pietropaoli, Manfred Westphal
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrea Morelli, Christian Ertmer, Matthias Lange, Alessandra Orecchioni, Sebastian Rehberg, P Pietropaoli, Manfred Westphal
Abstract
Open-access reader
The results of the Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial suggest that early administration of vasopressin may be superior to a last resort treatment. However, it is still unknown whether vasopressin is superior to terlipressin. We therefore performed a randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusions of either vasopressin or terlipressin as first-line therapy in patients with septic shock.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The results of the Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial suggest that early administration of vasopressin may be superior to a last resort treatment. However, it is still unknown whether vasopressin is superior to terlipressin. We therefore performed a randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusions of either vasopressin or terlipressin as first-line therapy in patients with septic shock.
Key concepts: Terlipressin, Vasopressin, Medicine, Septic shock, Shock (circulatory), Anesthesia, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine