Using the information seeking and retrieval framework to analyse non-professional information use
Richard J. Butterworth, Veronica Davis Perkins
Abstract
Richard J. Butterworth, Veronica Davis Perkins
Abstract
The outcomes of three digital library projects are discussed within Ingwersen and Järvelin's Information Seeking and Retrieval framework [1]. The common theme of these projects is that they addressed information use by users who were neither academics or information professionals. This generates a picture of information use not often seen in the LIS literature, and shows some interesting differences between professional and non-professional information use, particularly in the areas of organisational and social context. The value of Ingwersen and Järvelin's framework is shown in that it promotes the identification of commonalities between the different projects, promotes explanations of some of the observations made in the three projects, and suggests an agenda for future work.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The outcomes of three digital library projects are discussed within Ingwersen and Järvelin's Information Seeking and Retrieval framework [1]. The common theme of these projects is that they addressed information use by users who were neither academics or information professionals. This generates a picture of information use not often seen in the LIS literature, and shows some interesting differences between professional and non-professional information use, particularly in the areas of organisational and social context. The value of Ingwersen and Järvelin's framework is shown in that it promotes the identification of commonalities between the different projects, promotes explanations of some of the observations made in the three projects, and suggests an agenda for future work.
Key concepts: Computer science, Information seeking, Information retrieval, Knowledge management, Human–computer information retrieval, Cognitive models of information retrieval, Data science, Search engine