Frequency Discrimination as Measured by AB and ABX Procedures
Michael G. Saslow
Abstract
Michael G. Saslow
Abstract
It is often reported that difference thresholds for frequency when measured by an ABX procedure are at least twice as great as those measured by an AB procedure. The relationship has always been rationalized in terms of the greater phsyical and judgmental complexity of the ABX procedure. The present experiment was performed at 120 cps, 70 dB SPL, with two practiced subjects. For frequency differences of plus or minus 0.3 cps, or 0.25%, responses were 95% correct for ABX, and 82% correct for AB. This result contradicts the usual findings, and suggests a need for a new analysis of frequency-judgment mechanisms.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is often reported that difference thresholds for frequency when measured by an ABX procedure are at least twice as great as those measured by an AB procedure. The relationship has always been rationalized in terms of the greater phsyical and judgmental complexity of the ABX procedure. The present experiment was performed at 120 cps, 70 dB SPL, with two practiced subjects. For frequency differences of plus or minus 0.3 cps, or 0.25%, responses were 95% correct for ABX, and 82% correct for AB. This result contradicts the usual findings, and suggests a need for a new analysis of frequency-judgment mechanisms.
Key concepts: ABX test, Mathematics, Acoustics, Statistics, Audiology, Physics, Medicine