2008International Review of Law Computers & TechnologyRequires access

‘Caveat Viewer!’: The rationale of the possession offence

Abhilash Nair

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In the light of the increasing availability of extreme and violent pornography on the Internet and its perceived harmful effect on society, a new law is being proposed that would render the simple possession of such material a criminal offence. Child pornography laws are similar to the proposed law in some respect, but there are major differences between them. This article looks at the rationale behind possession offence and analyses it in the context of child pornography. The article will then proceed by highlighting some of the legal issues involved in regulating extreme pornography, both at domestic and EU levels, and contrast this with child pornography laws. This will be examined from a human rights perspective, with particular reference to free expression and privacy rights. The article will analyse if the possession offence for extreme pornography undermines any of these rights, in which case it would be wiser to explore other possible avenues for regulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the light of the increasing availability of extreme and violent pornography on the Internet and its perceived harmful effect on society, a new law is being proposed that would render the simple possession of such material a criminal offence. Child pornography laws are similar to the proposed law in some respect, but there are major differences between them. This article looks at the rationale behind possession offence and analyses it in the context of child pornography. The article will then proceed by highlighting some of the legal issues involved in regulating extreme pornography, both at domestic and EU levels, and contrast this with child pornography laws. This will be examined from a human rights perspective, with particular reference to free expression and privacy rights. The article will analyse if the possession offence for extreme pornography undermines any of these rights, in which case it would be wiser to explore other possible avenues for regulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the light of the increasing availability of extreme and violent pornography on the Internet and its perceived harmful effect on society, a new law is being proposed that would render the simple possession of such material a criminal offence. Child pornography laws are similar to the proposed law in some respect, but there are major differences between them. This article looks at the rationale behind possession offence and analyses it in the context of child pornography. The article will then proceed by highlighting some of the legal issues involved in regulating extreme pornography, both at domestic and EU levels, and contrast this with child pornography laws. This will be examined from a human rights perspective, with particular reference to free expression and privacy rights. The article will analyse if the possession offence for extreme pornography undermines any of these rights, in which case it would be wiser to explore other possible avenues for regulation.

Key concepts: Possession (linguistics), Child pornography, Pornography, Context (archaeology), Law, Perspective (graphical), Political science, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘Caveat Viewer!’: The rationale of the possession offence — Research Paper | ScholarLens