2012SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

"Just looking": when does viewing online constitute possession?

Jonathan Clough

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Digital technology has greatly facilitated the production and distribution of child pornography, and in many jurisdictions it is an offense to possess child pornography. However, concepts of possession, which evolved in the context of tangible items, may be difficult to apply to digital images. One such issue arises where a defendant views child pornography online, but does not take active steps to download it. If such conduct does not constitute possession, then it may be possible for a person to view child pornography with impunity. This article discusses the nature of possession in the criminal law, and its application to digital images. The specific issue of “viewing as possession” is introduced, followed by an analysis of authorities considering this issue. It is argued that although the act of viewing online does constitute possession, the difficulties associated with proving such cases necessitates the enactment of an offense of accessing child pornography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Digital technology has greatly facilitated the production and distribution of child pornography, and in many jurisdictions it is an offense to possess child pornography. However, concepts of possession, which evolved in the context of tangible items, may be difficult to apply to digital images. One such issue arises where a defendant views child pornography online, but does not take active steps to download it. If such conduct does not constitute possession, then it may be possible for a person to view child pornography with impunity. This article discusses the nature of possession in the criminal law, and its application to digital images. The specific issue of “viewing as possession” is introduced, followed by an analysis of authorities considering this issue. It is argued that although the act of viewing online does constitute possession, the difficulties associated with proving such cases necessitates the enactment of an offense of accessing child pornography.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Digital technology has greatly facilitated the production and distribution of child pornography, and in many jurisdictions it is an offense to possess child pornography. However, concepts of possession, which evolved in the context of tangible items, may be difficult to apply to digital images. One such issue arises where a defendant views child pornography online, but does not take active steps to download it. If such conduct does not constitute possession, then it may be possible for a person to view child pornography with impunity. This article discusses the nature of possession in the criminal law, and its application to digital images. The specific issue of “viewing as possession” is introduced, followed by an analysis of authorities considering this issue. It is argued that although the act of viewing online does constitute possession, the difficulties associated with proving such cases necessitates the enactment of an offense of accessing child pornography.

Key concepts: Possession (linguistics), Child pornography, Pornography, The Internet, Internet privacy, Psychology, Context (archaeology), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Just looking": when does viewing online constitute possession? — Research Paper | ScholarLens