Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging using inversion recovery single‐shot steady‐state free precession: Initial experience
Wei Li, Belinda S.Y. Li, Jason A. Polzin, Vu M., Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Robert R. Edelman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Wei Li, Belinda S.Y. Li, Jason A. Polzin, Vu M., Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Robert R. Edelman
Abstract
Open-access reader
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using an inversion recovery single-shot steady-state free precession (SS_SSFP) sequence for myocardial delayed enhancement (MDE) imaging, and to compare SS_SSFP with the conventional inversion recovery segmented fast gradient echo (IR_FGRE) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten subjects (four volunteers and six patients with suspected or known coronary disease) were included in this study. All subjects were scanned with both IR_FGRE and SS_SSFP sequences 15-25 minutes after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. Overall image quality, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between the two techniques were compared. RESULTS: Compared to IR_FGRE, SS_SSFP exhibited adequate image quality (average scores = 3.8 for IR_FGRE and 3.9 for SS_SSFP) with much shorter acquisition time (14.4 seconds for IR_FGRE and 1.3 seconds for SS_SSFP). SS_SSFP images showed higher SNRs (P < 0.05) and less motion artifact from breathing. Enhanced myocardium was detected by both techniques in three patients, but the image sharpness is compromised in SS_SSFP images. CONCLUSION: SS_SSFP provides adequate image quality compared to IR_FGRE, while requiring a much shorter acquisition time. It is feasible to use SS_SSFP as an alternative method for MDE imaging, especially in patients who have difficulty with holding their breath.
OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using an inversion recovery single-shot steady-state free precession (SS_SSFP) sequence for myocardial delayed enhancement (MDE) imaging, and to compare SS_SSFP with the conventional inversion recovery segmented fast gradient echo (IR_FGRE) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten subjects (four volunteers and six patients with suspected or known coronary disease) were included in this study. All subjects were scanned with both IR_FGRE and SS_SSFP sequences 15-25 minutes after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. Overall image quality, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between the two techniques were compared. RESULTS: Compared to IR_FGRE, SS_SSFP exhibited adequate image quality (average scores = 3.8 for IR_FGRE and 3.9 for SS_SSFP) with much shorter acquisition time (14.4 seconds for IR_FGRE and 1.3 seconds for SS_SSFP). SS_SSFP images showed higher SNRs (P < 0.05) and less motion artifact from breathing. Enhanced myocardium was detected by both techniques in three patients, but the image sharpness is compromised in SS_SSFP images. CONCLUSION: SS_SSFP provides adequate image quality compared to IR_FGRE, while requiring a much shorter acquisition time. It is feasible to use SS_SSFP as an alternative method for MDE imaging, especially in patients who have difficulty with holding their breath.
Key concepts: Steady-state free precession imaging, Image quality, Artifact (error), Nuclear medicine, Medicine, Nuclear magnetic resonance, Radiology, Magnetic resonance imaging