1987•The Journal of Hellenic StudiesRequires access

Aristotle, Metaphysics 1019a4

Robin Waterfield

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The broad context is a discussion of priority and posteriority, which runs from 1018b9–1019a14 (compare Categories 14a26–b24). A type of priority is described at 1019a2–4, and then further discussed at 1019a4–14. It is described as follows: ‘All those things are said to be prior in respect of nature and being, which can exist without other things, while those other things cannot exist without them.’ My concern in this note is with the parenthesis which immediately follows: ‘This is a distinction which Plato employed.’ All the commentators despair of locating this reference to Plato. Some, like Tredennick, (ad loc. in his Loeb edition), simply despair; others, like Ross (ad loc. in his edition), speak of ‘an oral utterance’, and are accordingly tempted towards finding yet another reference to the Unwritten Doctrines, either in the vague sense that anything not in the dialogues is by definition ‘unwritten’, or more specifically in the sense of some aspect of the doctrine of ideal numbers (e.g. Trendelenburg, cited by Ross).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The broad context is a discussion of priority and posteriority, which runs from 1018b9–1019a14 (compare Categories 14a26–b24). A type of priority is described at 1019a2–4, and then further discussed at 1019a4–14. It is described as follows: ‘All those things are said to be prior in respect of nature and being, which can exist without other things, while those other things cannot exist without them.’ My concern in this note is with the parenthesis which immediately follows: ‘This is a distinction which Plato employed.’ All the commentators despair of locating this reference to Plato. Some, like Tredennick, (ad loc. in his Loeb edition), simply despair; others, like Ross (ad loc. in his edition), speak of ‘an oral utterance’, and are accordingly tempted towards finding yet another reference to the Unwritten Doctrines, either in the vague sense that anything not in the dialogues is by definition ‘unwritten’, or more specifically in the sense of some aspect of the doctrine of ideal numbers (e.g. Trendelenburg, cited by Ross).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The broad context is a discussion of priority and posteriority, which runs from 1018b9–1019a14 (compare Categories 14a26–b24). A type of priority is described at 1019a2–4, and then further discussed at 1019a4–14. It is described as follows: ‘All those things are said to be prior in respect of nature and being, which can exist without other things, while those other things cannot exist without them.’ My concern in this note is with the parenthesis which immediately follows: ‘This is a distinction which Plato employed.’ All the commentators despair of locating this reference to Plato. Some, like Tredennick, (ad loc. in his Loeb edition), simply despair; others, like Ross (ad loc. in his edition), speak of ‘an oral utterance’, and are accordingly tempted towards finding yet another reference to the Unwritten Doctrines, either in the vague sense that anything not in the dialogues is by definition ‘unwritten’, or more specifically in the sense of some aspect of the doctrine of ideal numbers (e.g. Trendelenburg, cited by Ross).

Key concepts: Philosophy, Metaphysics, Parenthesis, Context (archaeology), Ideal (ethics), Utterance, Epistemology, Doctrine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aristotle, Metaphysics 1019a4 — Research Paper | ScholarLens