“Civil society that so perturbs”:Zapatismoand the democracy of civil society
Gideon Baker
Abstract
Gideon Baker
Abstract
The debate surrounding civil society and democracy is centrally concerned with which spaces democracy should be practised in. In many versions of the argument, and against the flow of previous democratic thought, practising democracy outside the state is seen as the best hope for a democratic future. It is perhaps no surprise, then, that much has been made of the concept of civil society by the Zapatistas, particularly by their figurehead Subcomandante Marcos, since their uprising against the Mexican state began in 1994. But exactly how do the Zapatistas conceive of civil society as democratic theory and practice? And what might we learn more generally from the idea of a democracy located in civil society rather than the state?
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The debate surrounding civil society and democracy is centrally concerned with which spaces democracy should be practised in. In many versions of the argument, and against the flow of previous democratic thought, practising democracy outside the state is seen as the best hope for a democratic future. It is perhaps no surprise, then, that much has been made of the concept of civil society by the Zapatistas, particularly by their figurehead Subcomandante Marcos, since their uprising against the Mexican state began in 1994. But exactly how do the Zapatistas conceive of civil society as democratic theory and practice? And what might we learn more generally from the idea of a democracy located in civil society rather than the state?
Key concepts: Democracy, Civil society, State (computer science), Argument (complex analysis), Surprise, Sociology, Political science, Law