1999Scandinavian Journal of RheumatologyRequires access

Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: Comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis

J. S. Smolen

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.

Key concepts: Leflunomide, Medicine, Sulfasalazine, Rheumatoid arthritis, Placebo, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: Comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis — Research Paper | ScholarLens