2008Digestive SurgeryRequires access

Postprandial Portal Vein Flow in Portal Hypertension and after Distal Splenorenal Shunt

Donald L. Jacobs, Joseph C. Anderson, Robert A. Cormier, Layton F. Rikkers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Postprandial portal vein flow (PVF) was measured using duplex ultrasound in healthy controls, patients with nonshunted portal hypertension and patients with distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS). In the fasting state, PVF was significantly greater in patients with portal hypertension (1,077 ± 45 ml/min) than in controls (672 ± 16 ml/min, p < 0.005) or in patients with DSRS (280 ± 30 ml/min, p < 0.005) and significantly greater in controls than in the DSRS group. After eating, only the controls showed significant increases in PVF (128 ± 8, 103 ± 9, and 47 ± 3% increase above fasting PVF at 30, 90, and 150 min, respectively; all p < 0.005). In portal hypertensive patients, eating did not result in a consistent change in PVF. In the fasting state, 6 DSRS patients had prograde flow and 4 had retrograde flow. Shunt patients with prograde flow had a response in PVF after eating similar to that seen in nonshunted portal hypertension patients (4 with increased and 2 with unchanged flow). None of the shunt patients with retrograde flow developed prograde flow after eating. In conclusion: (1) fasting PVF is greater in portal hypertension patients and less in DSRS patients compared to controls; (2) eating results in increased PVF in controls but no consistent response is seen in portal hypertension or in DSRS patients, and (3) DSRS patients with retrograde PVF do not convert to prograde flow after eating.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Postprandial portal vein flow (PVF) was measured using duplex ultrasound in healthy controls, patients with nonshunted portal hypertension and patients with distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS). In the fasting state, PVF was significantly greater in patients with portal hypertension (1,077 ± 45 ml/min) than in controls (672 ± 16 ml/min, p < 0.005) or in patients with DSRS (280 ± 30 ml/min, p < 0.005) and significantly greater in controls than in the DSRS group. After eating, only the controls showed significant increases in PVF (128 ± 8, 103 ± 9, and 47 ± 3% increase above fasting PVF at 30, 90, and 150 min, respectively; all p < 0.005). In portal hypertensive patients, eating did not result in a consistent change in PVF. In the fasting state, 6 DSRS patients had prograde flow and 4 had retrograde flow. Shunt patients with prograde flow had a response in PVF after eating similar to that seen in nonshunted portal hypertension patients (4 with increased and 2 with unchanged flow). None of the shunt patients with retrograde flow developed prograde flow after eating. In conclusion: (1) fasting PVF is greater in portal hypertension patients and less in DSRS patients compared to controls; (2) eating results in increased PVF in controls but no consistent response is seen in portal hypertension or in DSRS patients, and (3) DSRS patients with retrograde PVF do not convert to prograde flow after eating.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Postprandial portal vein flow (PVF) was measured using duplex ultrasound in healthy controls, patients with nonshunted portal hypertension and patients with distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS). In the fasting state, PVF was significantly greater in patients with portal hypertension (1,077 ± 45 ml/min) than in controls (672 ± 16 ml/min, p < 0.005) or in patients with DSRS (280 ± 30 ml/min, p < 0.005) and significantly greater in controls than in the DSRS group. After eating, only the controls showed significant increases in PVF (128 ± 8, 103 ± 9, and 47 ± 3% increase above fasting PVF at 30, 90, and 150 min, respectively; all p < 0.005). In portal hypertensive patients, eating did not result in a consistent change in PVF. In the fasting state, 6 DSRS patients had prograde flow and 4 had retrograde flow. Shunt patients with prograde flow had a response in PVF after eating similar to that seen in nonshunted portal hypertension patients (4 with increased and 2 with unchanged flow). None of the shunt patients with retrograde flow developed prograde flow after eating. In conclusion: (1) fasting PVF is greater in portal hypertension patients and less in DSRS patients compared to controls; (2) eating results in increased PVF in controls but no consistent response is seen in portal hypertension or in DSRS patients, and (3) DSRS patients with retrograde PVF do not convert to prograde flow after eating.

Key concepts: Medicine, Postprandial, Portal hypertension, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Shunt (medical), Superior mesenteric vein, Portal vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postprandial Portal Vein Flow in Portal Hypertension and after Distal Splenorenal Shunt — Research Paper | ScholarLens