2004The Pain ClinicRequires access

Patient controlled epidural analgesia after major urologic surgery: A comparison of tramadol with morphine

Anış Ariboğan, Nurcan Doruk, Okan Balcıoğlu, Atilla Arıdoğan, Şule Akın, Sebnem Atici

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the paper was to assess and to compare the effectiveness and safety of patient controlled epidural analgesia using tramadol or morphine for postoperative analgesia after major urological surgeries.For patient-controlled epidural analgesia; in group I (n = 30) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol 0.1% with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml at a rate of 8 ml/h was administered preemptly and in group II (n = 30) a loading dose of 2 mg morphine in 20 ml normal saline was administered and a supplemental infusion of 0.2 mg/h morphine was begun at a rate of 2 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 minutes and a background infusion of 8 ml/h in tramadol 0.1% group and 2 ml/h in morphine 0.01% group were administered. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects were monitored at 0, 15, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours during the postoperative period.Adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. VAS values were significantly lower in group II than in group I after the fourth hour measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritius was lower in the tramadol group (p < 0.05).In conclusion we decided that, after major urologic surgery, patient-controlled epidural administration of tramadol with a continuous background infusion might provide a safe and effective analgesia with limited side effects, even though there is increased drug consumption.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of the paper was to assess and to compare the effectiveness and safety of patient controlled epidural analgesia using tramadol or morphine for postoperative analgesia after major urological surgeries.For patient-controlled epidural analgesia; in group I (n = 30) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol 0.1% with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml at a rate of 8 ml/h was administered preemptly and in group II (n = 30) a loading dose of 2 mg morphine in 20 ml normal saline was administered and a supplemental infusion of 0.2 mg/h morphine was begun at a rate of 2 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 minutes and a background infusion of 8 ml/h in tramadol 0.1% group and 2 ml/h in morphine 0.01% group were administered. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects were monitored at 0, 15, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours during the postoperative period.Adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. VAS values were significantly lower in group II than in group I after the fourth hour measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritius was lower in the tramadol group (p < 0.05).In conclusion we decided that, after major urologic surgery, patient-controlled epidural administration of tramadol with a continuous background infusion might provide a safe and effective analgesia with limited side effects, even though there is increased drug consumption.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of the paper was to assess and to compare the effectiveness and safety of patient controlled epidural analgesia using tramadol or morphine for postoperative analgesia after major urological surgeries.For patient-controlled epidural analgesia; in group I (n = 30) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol 0.1% with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml at a rate of 8 ml/h was administered preemptly and in group II (n = 30) a loading dose of 2 mg morphine in 20 ml normal saline was administered and a supplemental infusion of 0.2 mg/h morphine was begun at a rate of 2 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 minutes and a background infusion of 8 ml/h in tramadol 0.1% group and 2 ml/h in morphine 0.01% group were administered. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects were monitored at 0, 15, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours during the postoperative period.Adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. VAS values were significantly lower in group II than in group I after the fourth hour measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritius was lower in the tramadol group (p < 0.05).In conclusion we decided that, after major urologic surgery, patient-controlled epidural administration of tramadol with a continuous background infusion might provide a safe and effective analgesia with limited side effects, even though there is increased drug consumption.

Key concepts: Tramadol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sedation, Morphine, Nausea, Bolus (digestion), Vomiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patient controlled epidural analgesia after major urologic surgery: A comparison of tramadol with morphine — Research Paper | ScholarLens