2009ChemotherapyRequires access

Activity and Specific Beta-Lactamase Susceptibility of Cefoperazone and Moxalactam

Peter Mouton, Ger Bongaerts, M. Van Gestel, Kristiane M. Bruggeman-Ogle

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Comparison of the activity of cefoperazone, cefamandole, cefotaxime, cephalothin and moxalactam against Enterobacteriaceae showed cefoperazone to be twofold (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella) to eigthfold (Enterobacter) more active than cefamandole. The lowes MIC values were found for cefotaxime (0.03 - 0.25 microgram/ml) followed by moxalactam (0.06 - 0.25 microgram/ml). Cefoperazone stood out in activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC50 4 microgram/ml). Cephalothin resistance affected the MIC values of cefoperazone and moxalactam only to a small degree. From beta-lactamase susceptibility studies it was concluded that cefoperazone may be hydrolyzed by TEM type beta-lactamases, but that the cephalosporinases (class I) and the chromosomal broad-spectrum beta-lactamases (class IV) only have little effect on this antibiotic. Moxalactam was not degraded by any of the beta-lactamase preparations tested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison of the activity of cefoperazone, cefamandole, cefotaxime, cephalothin and moxalactam against Enterobacteriaceae showed cefoperazone to be twofold (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella) to eigthfold (Enterobacter) more active than cefamandole. The lowes MIC values were found for cefotaxime (0.03 - 0.25 microgram/ml) followed by moxalactam (0.06 - 0.25 microgram/ml). Cefoperazone stood out in activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC50 4 microgram/ml). Cephalothin resistance affected the MIC values of cefoperazone and moxalactam only to a small degree. From beta-lactamase susceptibility studies it was concluded that cefoperazone may be hydrolyzed by TEM type beta-lactamases, but that the cephalosporinases (class I) and the chromosomal broad-spectrum beta-lactamases (class IV) only have little effect on this antibiotic. Moxalactam was not degraded by any of the beta-lactamase preparations tested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison of the activity of cefoperazone, cefamandole, cefotaxime, cephalothin and moxalactam against Enterobacteriaceae showed cefoperazone to be twofold (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella) to eigthfold (Enterobacter) more active than cefamandole. The lowes MIC values were found for cefotaxime (0.03 - 0.25 microgram/ml) followed by moxalactam (0.06 - 0.25 microgram/ml). Cefoperazone stood out in activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC50 4 microgram/ml). Cephalothin resistance affected the MIC values of cefoperazone and moxalactam only to a small degree. From beta-lactamase susceptibility studies it was concluded that cefoperazone may be hydrolyzed by TEM type beta-lactamases, but that the cephalosporinases (class I) and the chromosomal broad-spectrum beta-lactamases (class IV) only have little effect on this antibiotic. Moxalactam was not degraded by any of the beta-lactamase preparations tested.

Key concepts: Moxalactam, Cefoperazone, Cefamandole, Cefotaxime, Cephalosporin, Microbiology, Chemistry, Latamoxef

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Activity and Specific Beta-Lactamase Susceptibility of Cefoperazone and Moxalactam — Research Paper | ScholarLens