Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to cefoperazone and other beta-lactam antibiotics.
Jacobus Nv, Tally Fp, Michael Barza, Gorbach Sl
Abstract
Jacobus Nv, Tally Fp, Michael Barza, Gorbach Sl
Abstract
The in vitro activity of cefoperazone was tested against 155 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria and compared to that of cefoxitin, LY127935 (moxalactam), cefotaxime, cefamandole, and cephalothin. Against the Bacteroides fragilis group, the compound was as active as LY127935, but less active than cefoxitin. Cefotaxime was less active than cefoperazone, cefoxitin, and LY127935. Cefoperazone, as well as cefoxitin, LY127935, and cefotaxime, exhibited excellent activity against all other anaerobic organisms tested. Cefamandole and cephalothin showed inferior activity when compared to the other four drugs.
OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The in vitro activity of cefoperazone was tested against 155 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria and compared to that of cefoxitin, LY127935 (moxalactam), cefotaxime, cefamandole, and cephalothin. Against the Bacteroides fragilis group, the compound was as active as LY127935, but less active than cefoxitin. Cefotaxime was less active than cefoperazone, cefoxitin, and LY127935. Cefoperazone, as well as cefoxitin, LY127935, and cefotaxime, exhibited excellent activity against all other anaerobic organisms tested. Cefamandole and cephalothin showed inferior activity when compared to the other four drugs.
Key concepts: Cefamandole, Cefoxitin, Cefoperazone, Moxalactam, Cefotaxime, Bacteroides fragilis, Microbiology, Medicine