Self modeling: Expanding the theories of learning
Peter W. Dowrick
Abstract
Peter W. Dowrick
Abstract
Abstract Self modeling (SM) offers a unique expansion of learning theory. For several decades, a steady trickle of empirical studies has reported consistent evidence for the efficacy of SM as a procedure for positive behavior change across physical, social, educational, and diagnostic variations. SM became accepted as an extreme case of model similarity; improved self‐efficacy became a frequent “explanation” of how it worked. Recently, however, the mounting evidence for ultra‐rapid behavior change (particularly in feedforward versions of video SM) and incomplete satisfaction with explanatory models of observational learning in general suggested a rethinking of underlying theory. The most rapid learning by humans can be achieved by mental simulations of future events, based on reconfigured preexisting component skills. These reconsiderations of learning from the future, emphasizing learning from oneself, have coincided with developments in neurocognitive theories of mirror neurons and mental time travel. A reexamination of principles not tied to any medium show SM not to be a special case but to be the most fundamental form of observational learning. In the meantime, commercial technology has advanced in ways that are putting more of this self‐determining behavior change into younger and younger hands and minds. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OpenAlex reports 90 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Self modeling (SM) offers a unique expansion of learning theory. For several decades, a steady trickle of empirical studies has reported consistent evidence for the efficacy of SM as a procedure for positive behavior change across physical, social, educational, and diagnostic variations. SM became accepted as an extreme case of model similarity; improved self‐efficacy became a frequent “explanation” of how it worked. Recently, however, the mounting evidence for ultra‐rapid behavior change (particularly in feedforward versions of video SM) and incomplete satisfaction with explanatory models of observational learning in general suggested a rethinking of underlying theory. The most rapid learning by humans can be achieved by mental simulations of future events, based on reconfigured preexisting component skills. These reconsiderations of learning from the future, emphasizing learning from oneself, have coincided with developments in neurocognitive theories of mirror neurons and mental time travel. A reexamination of principles not tied to any medium show SM not to be a special case but to be the most fundamental form of observational learning. In the meantime, commercial technology has advanced in ways that are putting more of this self‐determining behavior change into younger and younger hands and minds. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Key concepts: Observational learning, Psychology, Learning theory, Observational study, Cognitive psychology, Neurocognitive, Social learning, Similarity (geometry)