1982•Risk AnalysisRequires access

The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health

Gerald J.S. Wilde

Open publisher page 1,174 citations

Abstract

No strategy for countermeasure design or future directions of research in the areas of human behavior which leads to traffic accidents or lifestyle‐related diseases can be rationally developed without an acceptable working theory of human behavior in these domains. For this purpose, an attempt has been made to conceptually integrate the available evidence with respect to the role of human behavior in the causation of road accidents. From this integrative effort it would seem that the accident rate is ultimately dependent on one factor only, the target level of risk in the population concerned which acts as the reference variable in a homeostatic process relating accident rate to human motivation. Various policy tactics for the purpose of modifying this target level of risk have been pointed out and the theory of risk homeostasis has been speculatively extended to the areas of lifestyle‐dependent morbidity and mortality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No strategy for countermeasure design or future directions of research in the areas of human behavior which leads to traffic accidents or lifestyle‐related diseases can be rationally developed without an acceptable working theory of human behavior in these domains. For this purpose, an attempt has been made to conceptually integrate the available evidence with respect to the role of human behavior in the causation of road accidents. From this integrative effort it would seem that the accident rate is ultimately dependent on one factor only, the target level of risk in the population concerned which acts as the reference variable in a homeostatic process relating accident rate to human motivation. Various policy tactics for the purpose of modifying this target level of risk have been pointed out and the theory of risk homeostasis has been speculatively extended to the areas of lifestyle‐dependent morbidity and mortality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1174 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No strategy for countermeasure design or future directions of research in the areas of human behavior which leads to traffic accidents or lifestyle‐related diseases can be rationally developed without an acceptable working theory of human behavior in these domains. For this purpose, an attempt has been made to conceptually integrate the available evidence with respect to the role of human behavior in the causation of road accidents. From this integrative effort it would seem that the accident rate is ultimately dependent on one factor only, the target level of risk in the population concerned which acts as the reference variable in a homeostatic process relating accident rate to human motivation. Various policy tactics for the purpose of modifying this target level of risk have been pointed out and the theory of risk homeostasis has been speculatively extended to the areas of lifestyle‐dependent morbidity and mortality.

Key concepts: Causation, Countermeasure, Risk analysis (engineering), Human factors and ergonomics, Poison control, Occupational safety and health, Injury prevention, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health — Research Paper | ScholarLens