7. Causation and remoteness
Christian Witting
Abstract
Christian Witting
Abstract
This chapter examines the issues of causation and remoteness in negligence. It considers causation in fact, causation in law, and remoteness of damage. We find that courts have developed several important exceptions to the ordinary but-for test of causation, including the Fairchild principle. Legal causation is tested by looking for unexpected events called novi actus intervenientes. Remoteness is an issue of foreseeability of damage.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter examines the issues of causation and remoteness in negligence. It considers causation in fact, causation in law, and remoteness of damage. We find that courts have developed several important exceptions to the ordinary but-for test of causation, including the Fairchild principle. Legal causation is tested by looking for unexpected events called novi actus intervenientes. Remoteness is an issue of foreseeability of damage.
Key concepts: Causation, Epistemology, Philosophy