In Situ Lifetime, Causes for Replacement, and Complications of the ProvoxTMVoice Prosthesis
O. Laccourreye, Madeleine Ménard, Lise Crevier‐Buchman, Vincent Couloigner, Daniel Brasnu
Abstract
O. Laccourreye, Madeleine Ménard, Lise Crevier‐Buchman, Vincent Couloigner, Daniel Brasnu
Abstract
One hundred Provox voice prostheses consecutively inserted in 37 patients and replaced only when phonation was impaired or complications noted were analyzed for in situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications. The mean in situ lifetime was 311 days. Actuarial analysis (Kaplan-Meier method) of the in situ lifetime revealed that 65.9%, 23.7%, and 16.4% of the voice prosthesis were still in situ by the 6th, 12th, and 18th postinsertion month. Cause for replacement was salivary leakage through the prosthesis valve, salivary leakage around the prosthesis, deterioration of the prosthesis, and excessive crusting resulting in increased airflow resistance in 33%, 27%, 24%, and 16% of cases, respectively. Complications included granulation tissue formation, cervical cellulitis, necrosis of the tracheoesophageal puncture, tracheostomal stenosis, and swallowing impairment in six, two, one, three, and one patient, respectively.
OpenAlex reports 118 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One hundred Provox voice prostheses consecutively inserted in 37 patients and replaced only when phonation was impaired or complications noted were analyzed for in situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications. The mean in situ lifetime was 311 days. Actuarial analysis (Kaplan-Meier method) of the in situ lifetime revealed that 65.9%, 23.7%, and 16.4% of the voice prosthesis were still in situ by the 6th, 12th, and 18th postinsertion month. Cause for replacement was salivary leakage through the prosthesis valve, salivary leakage around the prosthesis, deterioration of the prosthesis, and excessive crusting resulting in increased airflow resistance in 33%, 27%, 24%, and 16% of cases, respectively. Complications included granulation tissue formation, cervical cellulitis, necrosis of the tracheoesophageal puncture, tracheostomal stenosis, and swallowing impairment in six, two, one, three, and one patient, respectively.
Key concepts: Voice prosthesis, Prosthesis, Medicine, Phonation, Surgery, Cellulitis, Swallowing, Complication