Comparison of Two Traps Used for Capturing Wild Crayfish
Brian P. Mangan, James J. Savitski, Neil Fisher
Abstract
Open-access reader
Brian P. Mangan, James J. Savitski, Neil Fisher
Abstract
Open-access reader
We compared two passive wire traps for trapping wild crayfish—a trap designed specifically for capturing crayfish and a minnow trap commonly adapted for this purpose. We investigated crayfish capture efficiency, retention of captured crayfish, and capture of non-target finfishes for both trap types in mesocosm and field experiments. The crayfish traps captured more crayfish than the minnow traps in both settings. The minnow traps better retained captured crayfish; however, they also captured significantly more non-target finfishes. We conclude that the crayfish trap performed better than minnow traps for the capture of wild crayfish.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We compared two passive wire traps for trapping wild crayfish—a trap designed specifically for capturing crayfish and a minnow trap commonly adapted for this purpose. We investigated crayfish capture efficiency, retention of captured crayfish, and capture of non-target finfishes for both trap types in mesocosm and field experiments. The crayfish traps captured more crayfish than the minnow traps in both settings. The minnow traps better retained captured crayfish; however, they also captured significantly more non-target finfishes. We conclude that the crayfish trap performed better than minnow traps for the capture of wild crayfish.
Key concepts: Crayfish, Minnow, Mesocosm, Fishery, Trap (plumbing), Biology, Ecology, Environmental science