1992Australian Journal of ZoologyRequires access

Biochemical Systematics of the Charadriiformes (Shorebirds) - Relationships Between the Charadrii, Scolopaci and Lari

PD Christian, Les Christidis, Richard Schodde

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Electrophoretic variation at 29 presumptive protein loci was examined among 30 species of Charadriiformes. Phenetic and cladistic analyses consistently identified three major lineages. The first included the Charadriidae (plovers, dotterels and lapwings), Burhinidae (stone-curlews), Recurvirostridae (avocets and stilts) and Haematopodidae (oystercatchers); the second the Scolopacidae (sandpipers, curlews and godwits); and the third the Lari (gulls and terns) and, arguably, the Glareolidae (coursers and pratincoles). The position of the Jacanidae (jacanas) was ambivalent, either clustering loosely with the Scolopacidae or as a separate lineage. The results of these analyses agree in many areas with those obtained from previous studies based upon skeletal morphology and DNA-DNA hybridisation, yet they differ also in relationships found both within and between the four lineages. The significance of these differences is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Electrophoretic variation at 29 presumptive protein loci was examined among 30 species of Charadriiformes. Phenetic and cladistic analyses consistently identified three major lineages. The first included the Charadriidae (plovers, dotterels and lapwings), Burhinidae (stone-curlews), Recurvirostridae (avocets and stilts) and Haematopodidae (oystercatchers); the second the Scolopacidae (sandpipers, curlews and godwits); and the third the Lari (gulls and terns) and, arguably, the Glareolidae (coursers and pratincoles). The position of the Jacanidae (jacanas) was ambivalent, either clustering loosely with the Scolopacidae or as a separate lineage. The results of these analyses agree in many areas with those obtained from previous studies based upon skeletal morphology and DNA-DNA hybridisation, yet they differ also in relationships found both within and between the four lineages. The significance of these differences is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Electrophoretic variation at 29 presumptive protein loci was examined among 30 species of Charadriiformes. Phenetic and cladistic analyses consistently identified three major lineages. The first included the Charadriidae (plovers, dotterels and lapwings), Burhinidae (stone-curlews), Recurvirostridae (avocets and stilts) and Haematopodidae (oystercatchers); the second the Scolopacidae (sandpipers, curlews and godwits); and the third the Lari (gulls and terns) and, arguably, the Glareolidae (coursers and pratincoles). The position of the Jacanidae (jacanas) was ambivalent, either clustering loosely with the Scolopacidae or as a separate lineage. The results of these analyses agree in many areas with those obtained from previous studies based upon skeletal morphology and DNA-DNA hybridisation, yet they differ also in relationships found both within and between the four lineages. The significance of these differences is discussed.

Key concepts: Charadriiformes, Systematics, Biology, Zoology, Cladistics, Evolutionary biology, Ecology, Taxonomy (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biochemical Systematics of the Charadriiformes (Shorebirds) - Relationships Between the Charadrii, Scolopaci and Lari — Research Paper | ScholarLens