1994The AukRequires access

Phylogenetic Relationships among Charadriiformes: Reanalysis of Previous Data

Mats Björklund

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

Data on waders and allies (Charadriiformes) previously published by Strauch are reanalyzed using cladistic techniques, rather than compatibility analysis as in the original paper. The resulting trees are compared to those of Strauch, to a previous cladistic reanalysis, and to trees based on DNA-DNA hybridization data. In contrast to all previous results, the current analysis shows scolopacine and charadriine waders to be a monophyletic group, each of them being monophyletic. The alcids form a very basal group. The thick-knees (Burhinidae) form a sister group to all waders and larids (gulls and terns). Chionis and Dromas are sister taxa to glareolids and waders. The data contain several uncertainties in character codings and polarizations, which in turn may affect the outcome in various ways.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Data on waders and allies (Charadriiformes) previously published by Strauch are reanalyzed using cladistic techniques, rather than compatibility analysis as in the original paper. The resulting trees are compared to those of Strauch, to a previous cladistic reanalysis, and to trees based on DNA-DNA hybridization data. In contrast to all previous results, the current analysis shows scolopacine and charadriine waders to be a monophyletic group, each of them being monophyletic. The alcids form a very basal group. The thick-knees (Burhinidae) form a sister group to all waders and larids (gulls and terns). Chionis and Dromas are sister taxa to glareolids and waders. The data contain several uncertainties in character codings and polarizations, which in turn may affect the outcome in various ways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Data on waders and allies (Charadriiformes) previously published by Strauch are reanalyzed using cladistic techniques, rather than compatibility analysis as in the original paper. The resulting trees are compared to those of Strauch, to a previous cladistic reanalysis, and to trees based on DNA-DNA hybridization data. In contrast to all previous results, the current analysis shows scolopacine and charadriine waders to be a monophyletic group, each of them being monophyletic. The alcids form a very basal group. The thick-knees (Burhinidae) form a sister group to all waders and larids (gulls and terns). Chionis and Dromas are sister taxa to glareolids and waders. The data contain several uncertainties in character codings and polarizations, which in turn may affect the outcome in various ways.

Key concepts: Charadriiformes, Cladistics, Monophyly, Sister group, Biology, Phylogenetic tree, Zoology, Taxon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenetic Relationships among Charadriiformes: Reanalysis of Previous Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens