1999•International Journal of CrashworthinessRequires access

Development of a side facing seat and seat belt system for the Australian Army Perentie 4×4

Shane Richardson, Raphael H. Grzebieta, Rongzheng Zou

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The survivability of soldiers in the rear of military vehicles when involved in a crash has been identified as an area of major concern. The Australian Army via Project TRANSAFE has developed and evaluated a range of side facing Seat and Seat Belt Systems (SSBS) for the Perentie 4x4 to improve crash survivability. Options which have been evaluated include; bench seat with lap seat belt, bench seat with lap sash seat belt, individual seat with harness, wooden seat with lap sash seat belt and a plastic seat with lap sash seat belt. Tests were conducted on isolated single seating systems and on multiple seating systems simulating the internal structure of the Perentie 4x4. Wooden and plastic prototype SSBS demonstrated a low probability for life threatening head, neck and chest injuries while the bench seat options and individual seat and harness SSBS have a high probability of serious, if not life threatening, head, neck and chest injuries. A set of three-dimensional MADYMO models were also developed and validated, simulating the SSBS with seated 50th percentile Hybrid Ill dummies subjected to a mid-severity crash pulse. The dummy kinematics and injury parameters from the simulation were compared to tests and fairly good agreement was found.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The survivability of soldiers in the rear of military vehicles when involved in a crash has been identified as an area of major concern. The Australian Army via Project TRANSAFE has developed and evaluated a range of side facing Seat and Seat Belt Systems (SSBS) for the Perentie 4x4 to improve crash survivability. Options which have been evaluated include; bench seat with lap seat belt, bench seat with lap sash seat belt, individual seat with harness, wooden seat with lap sash seat belt and a plastic seat with lap sash seat belt. Tests were conducted on isolated single seating systems and on multiple seating systems simulating the internal structure of the Perentie 4x4. Wooden and plastic prototype SSBS demonstrated a low probability for life threatening head, neck and chest injuries while the bench seat options and individual seat and harness SSBS have a high probability of serious, if not life threatening, head, neck and chest injuries. A set of three-dimensional MADYMO models were also developed and validated, simulating the SSBS with seated 50th percentile Hybrid Ill dummies subjected to a mid-severity crash pulse. The dummy kinematics and injury parameters from the simulation were compared to tests and fairly good agreement was found.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The survivability of soldiers in the rear of military vehicles when involved in a crash has been identified as an area of major concern. The Australian Army via Project TRANSAFE has developed and evaluated a range of side facing Seat and Seat Belt Systems (SSBS) for the Perentie 4x4 to improve crash survivability. Options which have been evaluated include; bench seat with lap seat belt, bench seat with lap sash seat belt, individual seat with harness, wooden seat with lap sash seat belt and a plastic seat with lap sash seat belt. Tests were conducted on isolated single seating systems and on multiple seating systems simulating the internal structure of the Perentie 4x4. Wooden and plastic prototype SSBS demonstrated a low probability for life threatening head, neck and chest injuries while the bench seat options and individual seat and harness SSBS have a high probability of serious, if not life threatening, head, neck and chest injuries. A set of three-dimensional MADYMO models were also developed and validated, simulating the SSBS with seated 50th percentile Hybrid Ill dummies subjected to a mid-severity crash pulse. The dummy kinematics and injury parameters from the simulation were compared to tests and fairly good agreement was found.

Key concepts: Seat belt, Hybrid III, Crash, Engineering, Poison control, Survivability, Aeronautics, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of a side facing seat and seat belt system for the Australian Army Perentie 4×4 — Research Paper | ScholarLens