1992Australian Journal of LinguisticsRequires access

Some problems in Kukatj phononology

Avan Breen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Kukatj is a language of north Queensland, Australia. Unusual (for Australia) phonetic features include a brief schwa‐like vowel, very common and nearly always predictable, and gemination of consonants after a short stressed vowel. The phonological analysis is influenced by a handful of forms which block a number of simplifications. Its features: (1) three rhotics, two of which are marginal in that they contrast with the third (and with one another) only in a few environments; (2) a featureless underlying vowel, realised as a surface vowel (usually schwa) or sometimes as syllabicity in a consonant when required by phonotactic rules prohibiting certain consonant clusters but also ‐rarely ‐ separating consonants which could have formed a permissible cluster; (3) phonemic vowel length (rather than phonemic consonant gemination; and (4) a minimal underlying word of two syllables (although surface monosyllables are common). Phonetically retroflexed consonants (other than the glide) are analysed as apical tap plus apico‐alveolar consonant. This has been proposed before for other Australian languages, but with little justification, and is relevant to theories of the history of retroflexes in Australia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Kukatj is a language of north Queensland, Australia. Unusual (for Australia) phonetic features include a brief schwa‐like vowel, very common and nearly always predictable, and gemination of consonants after a short stressed vowel. The phonological analysis is influenced by a handful of forms which block a number of simplifications. Its features: (1) three rhotics, two of which are marginal in that they contrast with the third (and with one another) only in a few environments; (2) a featureless underlying vowel, realised as a surface vowel (usually schwa) or sometimes as syllabicity in a consonant when required by phonotactic rules prohibiting certain consonant clusters but also ‐rarely ‐ separating consonants which could have formed a permissible cluster; (3) phonemic vowel length (rather than phonemic consonant gemination; and (4) a minimal underlying word of two syllables (although surface monosyllables are common). Phonetically retroflexed consonants (other than the glide) are analysed as apical tap plus apico‐alveolar consonant. This has been proposed before for other Australian languages, but with little justification, and is relevant to theories of the history of retroflexes in Australia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Kukatj is a language of north Queensland, Australia. Unusual (for Australia) phonetic features include a brief schwa‐like vowel, very common and nearly always predictable, and gemination of consonants after a short stressed vowel. The phonological analysis is influenced by a handful of forms which block a number of simplifications. Its features: (1) three rhotics, two of which are marginal in that they contrast with the third (and with one another) only in a few environments; (2) a featureless underlying vowel, realised as a surface vowel (usually schwa) or sometimes as syllabicity in a consonant when required by phonotactic rules prohibiting certain consonant clusters but also ‐rarely ‐ separating consonants which could have formed a permissible cluster; (3) phonemic vowel length (rather than phonemic consonant gemination; and (4) a minimal underlying word of two syllables (although surface monosyllables are common). Phonetically retroflexed consonants (other than the glide) are analysed as apical tap plus apico‐alveolar consonant. This has been proposed before for other Australian languages, but with little justification, and is relevant to theories of the history of retroflexes in Australia.

Key concepts: Schwa, Phonotactics, Vowel, Consonant cluster, Consonant, Linguistics, Relative articulation, Mid vowel

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some problems in Kukatj phononology — Research Paper | ScholarLens