1993Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryRequires access

Evaluation of a one-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens with a 7 mm biconvex optic and a total diameter of 10 mm

Michael A. Amon, Rupert Menapace

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

To find out how large the total diameter of an open-loop intraocular lens (IOL) should be, we studied 90 consecutive implantations of a one-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL with a 7 mm biconvex optic and a total diameter of 10 mm (Adatomed 75 ST). The lens design made implantation simple, even through a small capsulorhexis. In 85% of the cases, the IOL remained well centered. One case with asymmetric placement of the IOL showed a decentration of more than 1 mm. In 14% of the eyes slight decentrations occurred because the capsular bag was too large. Contact between the iris and IOL was found in 15%. In 4% there were folds in the posterior capsule, and in 35% there was a small space between the IOL and the posterior capsule because the capsular bag was too large. Although the ST lens has a small total diameter, it remained at a distance from the iris in most cases. In-the-bag implantation through a continuous central capsulorhexis is mandatory to avoid secondary displacement; nevertheless, slight decentrations cannot be excluded. For a large capsular bag, the total diameter of an IOL should exceed 10 mm. Clinical results, cellular reaction on the lens surface (26.6%), biocompatibility, and visual performance are comparable to those of other well-approved poly(methyl methacrylate) IOLs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To find out how large the total diameter of an open-loop intraocular lens (IOL) should be, we studied 90 consecutive implantations of a one-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL with a 7 mm biconvex optic and a total diameter of 10 mm (Adatomed 75 ST). The lens design made implantation simple, even through a small capsulorhexis. In 85% of the cases, the IOL remained well centered. One case with asymmetric placement of the IOL showed a decentration of more than 1 mm. In 14% of the eyes slight decentrations occurred because the capsular bag was too large. Contact between the iris and IOL was found in 15%. In 4% there were folds in the posterior capsule, and in 35% there was a small space between the IOL and the posterior capsule because the capsular bag was too large. Although the ST lens has a small total diameter, it remained at a distance from the iris in most cases. In-the-bag implantation through a continuous central capsulorhexis is mandatory to avoid secondary displacement; nevertheless, slight decentrations cannot be excluded. For a large capsular bag, the total diameter of an IOL should exceed 10 mm. Clinical results, cellular reaction on the lens surface (26.6%), biocompatibility, and visual performance are comparable to those of other well-approved poly(methyl methacrylate) IOLs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To find out how large the total diameter of an open-loop intraocular lens (IOL) should be, we studied 90 consecutive implantations of a one-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL with a 7 mm biconvex optic and a total diameter of 10 mm (Adatomed 75 ST). The lens design made implantation simple, even through a small capsulorhexis. In 85% of the cases, the IOL remained well centered. One case with asymmetric placement of the IOL showed a decentration of more than 1 mm. In 14% of the eyes slight decentrations occurred because the capsular bag was too large. Contact between the iris and IOL was found in 15%. In 4% there were folds in the posterior capsule, and in 35% there was a small space between the IOL and the posterior capsule because the capsular bag was too large. Although the ST lens has a small total diameter, it remained at a distance from the iris in most cases. In-the-bag implantation through a continuous central capsulorhexis is mandatory to avoid secondary displacement; nevertheless, slight decentrations cannot be excluded. For a large capsular bag, the total diameter of an IOL should exceed 10 mm. Clinical results, cellular reaction on the lens surface (26.6%), biocompatibility, and visual performance are comparable to those of other well-approved poly(methyl methacrylate) IOLs.

Key concepts: Capsulorhexis, Intraocular lens, Lens (geology), Ophthalmology, Capsule, Intraocular lenses, IRIS (biosensor), Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of a one-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens with a 7 mm biconvex optic and a total diameter of 10 mm — Research Paper | ScholarLens