Different Techniques for the Modeling of Concrete Box Girder Bridges
Deepak Rayamajhi, Naveed Anwar, Jimmy Chandra
Abstract
Deepak Rayamajhi, Naveed Anwar, Jimmy Chandra
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison between response of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges analyzed by using different modeling techniques. Each type of modeling technique requires a certain set of assumptions to simplify the problem and thus results obtained from these techniques vary according to the assumptions made. In this study, a typical concrete box-girder bridge is analyzed using commercially available finite element software for two analysis cases, static and modal. Static analysis is used to study the responses of the bridges for dead load, moving load and post-tensioning load cases whereas modal analysis is used to study modal dynamic responses of the bridge. Finally, response of the bridge is compared in terms of natural time periods, mode shapes, support reactions, deformations, and internal forces. This study shows that with proper assumptions, similar results can be achieved from different modeling techniques.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents a comparison between response of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges analyzed by using different modeling techniques. Each type of modeling technique requires a certain set of assumptions to simplify the problem and thus results obtained from these techniques vary according to the assumptions made. In this study, a typical concrete box-girder bridge is analyzed using commercially available finite element software for two analysis cases, static and modal. Static analysis is used to study the responses of the bridges for dead load, moving load and post-tensioning load cases whereas modal analysis is used to study modal dynamic responses of the bridge. Finally, response of the bridge is compared in terms of natural time periods, mode shapes, support reactions, deformations, and internal forces. This study shows that with proper assumptions, similar results can be achieved from different modeling techniques.
Key concepts: Structural engineering, Modal analysis, Box girder, Modal, Finite element method, Bridge (graph theory), Static analysis, Computer science