2009ReportRequires access

Different Techniques for the Modeling of Concrete Box Girder Bridges

Deepak Rayamajhi, Naveed Anwar, Jimmy Chandra

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between response of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges analyzed by using different modeling techniques. Each type of modeling technique requires a certain set of assumptions to simplify the problem and thus results obtained from these techniques vary according to the assumptions made. In this study, a typical concrete box-girder bridge is analyzed using commercially available finite element software for two analysis cases, static and modal. Static analysis is used to study the responses of the bridges for dead load, moving load and post-tensioning load cases whereas modal analysis is used to study modal dynamic responses of the bridge. Finally, response of the bridge is compared in terms of natural time periods, mode shapes, support reactions, deformations, and internal forces. This study shows that with proper assumptions, similar results can be achieved from different modeling techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a comparison between response of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges analyzed by using different modeling techniques. Each type of modeling technique requires a certain set of assumptions to simplify the problem and thus results obtained from these techniques vary according to the assumptions made. In this study, a typical concrete box-girder bridge is analyzed using commercially available finite element software for two analysis cases, static and modal. Static analysis is used to study the responses of the bridges for dead load, moving load and post-tensioning load cases whereas modal analysis is used to study modal dynamic responses of the bridge. Finally, response of the bridge is compared in terms of natural time periods, mode shapes, support reactions, deformations, and internal forces. This study shows that with proper assumptions, similar results can be achieved from different modeling techniques.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a comparison between response of post-tensioned concrete box-girder bridges analyzed by using different modeling techniques. Each type of modeling technique requires a certain set of assumptions to simplify the problem and thus results obtained from these techniques vary according to the assumptions made. In this study, a typical concrete box-girder bridge is analyzed using commercially available finite element software for two analysis cases, static and modal. Static analysis is used to study the responses of the bridges for dead load, moving load and post-tensioning load cases whereas modal analysis is used to study modal dynamic responses of the bridge. Finally, response of the bridge is compared in terms of natural time periods, mode shapes, support reactions, deformations, and internal forces. This study shows that with proper assumptions, similar results can be achieved from different modeling techniques.

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Modal analysis, Box girder, Modal, Finite element method, Bridge (graph theory), Static analysis, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different Techniques for the Modeling of Concrete Box Girder Bridges — Research Paper | ScholarLens