1969•Journal of Food ScienceRequires access

Quantitative Determination of Formic, Acetic, Propionic and Butyric Acids in Frozen Whole Eggs by Gas‐Liquid Chromatography

John E. Steinhauer, L.E. Dawson

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY — Whole eggs containing known amounts of formic, acetic, propionic and butyric (C 1 ‐C 4 ) acids were evaluated using gas‐liquid chromatography (GLC) and AOAC (1960) procedures. Acetic, propionic and butyric acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as the acids per se, along with an internal standard. Formic and acetic acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as their butyl ester derivatives without an internal standard. Quantitation of butyl formate and butyl acetate was accomplished by comparing the chromatogram peak heights of the butyl esters recovered from the egg samples with the chromatogram peak heights of a known concentration of butyl ester standards. The recovery of acids from whole egg samples by GLC procedures was as accurate, and generally less variable, than by AOAC (1960) procedures. The percentage recovery of acids from whole egg samples using GLC procedures depended on the concentrations of the acids present and was as follows: acetic acid varied from 114 to 100% (low to high concentration); propionic acid varied from 101 to 100% (low to high concentrations); and butyric acid varied from 103 to 99% (low to high concentration). The recovery of formic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 104 to 96% (low to high concentration), while the recovery of acetic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 102 to 98% (low to high concentration).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY — Whole eggs containing known amounts of formic, acetic, propionic and butyric (C 1 ‐C 4 ) acids were evaluated using gas‐liquid chromatography (GLC) and AOAC (1960) procedures. Acetic, propionic and butyric acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as the acids per se, along with an internal standard. Formic and acetic acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as their butyl ester derivatives without an internal standard. Quantitation of butyl formate and butyl acetate was accomplished by comparing the chromatogram peak heights of the butyl esters recovered from the egg samples with the chromatogram peak heights of a known concentration of butyl ester standards. The recovery of acids from whole egg samples by GLC procedures was as accurate, and generally less variable, than by AOAC (1960) procedures. The percentage recovery of acids from whole egg samples using GLC procedures depended on the concentrations of the acids present and was as follows: acetic acid varied from 114 to 100% (low to high concentration); propionic acid varied from 101 to 100% (low to high concentrations); and butyric acid varied from 103 to 99% (low to high concentration). The recovery of formic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 104 to 96% (low to high concentration), while the recovery of acetic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 102 to 98% (low to high concentration).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY — Whole eggs containing known amounts of formic, acetic, propionic and butyric (C 1 ‐C 4 ) acids were evaluated using gas‐liquid chromatography (GLC) and AOAC (1960) procedures. Acetic, propionic and butyric acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as the acids per se, along with an internal standard. Formic and acetic acids were recovered from whole egg samples and chromatographed as their butyl ester derivatives without an internal standard. Quantitation of butyl formate and butyl acetate was accomplished by comparing the chromatogram peak heights of the butyl esters recovered from the egg samples with the chromatogram peak heights of a known concentration of butyl ester standards. The recovery of acids from whole egg samples by GLC procedures was as accurate, and generally less variable, than by AOAC (1960) procedures. The percentage recovery of acids from whole egg samples using GLC procedures depended on the concentrations of the acids present and was as follows: acetic acid varied from 114 to 100% (low to high concentration); propionic acid varied from 101 to 100% (low to high concentrations); and butyric acid varied from 103 to 99% (low to high concentration). The recovery of formic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 104 to 96% (low to high concentration), while the recovery of acetic acid as its butyl ester derivative varied from 102 to 98% (low to high concentration).

Key concepts: Chemistry, Formic acid, Butyric acid, Acetic acid, Chromatography, Formate, Gas chromatography, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative Determination of Formic, Acetic, Propionic and Butyric Acids in Frozen Whole Eggs by Gas‐Liquid Chromatography — Research Paper | ScholarLens