2001The Journal of Physical Chemistry BRequires access

Photooxidation of Formic Acid vs Formate and Ethanol vs Ethoxy on TiO2 and Effect of Adsorbed Water on the Rates of Formate and Formic Acid Photooxidation

Li-Fen Liao, Wen-Chun Wu, Chia‐Yuan Chen, Jong‐Liang Lin

Open publisher page 145 citations

Abstract

Comparison of photooxidation rates of formic acid and formate on TiO 2 as well as the effect of adsorbed water on formate and formic acid photodecomposition rates have been investigated by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Adsorbed formic acid and formate are all photooxidized to CO 2 in O 2 . Formic acid on TiO 2 shows a photoreaction rate that is roughly 53 times that of formate groups for a same surface concentration. The presence of H 2 O can increase formate and formic acid photooxidation rates by a factor close to 2. In addition, photochemistry of adsorbed ethanol and ethoxy is also compared. It is found that ethanol is important for the formation of acetaldehyde, while ethoxy groups are photooxidized to adsorbed acetate, formate, and water. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison of photooxidation rates of formic acid and formate on TiO 2 as well as the effect of adsorbed water on formate and formic acid photodecomposition rates have been investigated by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Adsorbed formic acid and formate are all photooxidized to CO 2 in O 2 . Formic acid on TiO 2 shows a photoreaction rate that is roughly 53 times that of formate groups for a same surface concentration. The presence of H 2 O can increase formate and formic acid photooxidation rates by a factor close to 2. In addition, photochemistry of adsorbed ethanol and ethoxy is also compared. It is found that ethanol is important for the formation of acetaldehyde, while ethoxy groups are photooxidized to adsorbed acetate, formate, and water. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 145 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison of photooxidation rates of formic acid and formate on TiO 2 as well as the effect of adsorbed water on formate and formic acid photodecomposition rates have been investigated by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Adsorbed formic acid and formate are all photooxidized to CO 2 in O 2 . Formic acid on TiO 2 shows a photoreaction rate that is roughly 53 times that of formate groups for a same surface concentration. The presence of H 2 O can increase formate and formic acid photooxidation rates by a factor close to 2. In addition, photochemistry of adsorbed ethanol and ethoxy is also compared. It is found that ethanol is important for the formation of acetaldehyde, while ethoxy groups are photooxidized to adsorbed acetate, formate, and water. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Key concepts: Formate, Formic acid, Chemistry, Acetaldehyde, Photochemistry, Adsorption, Alkoxy group, Ethanol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Photooxidation of Formic Acid vs Formate and Ethanol vs Ethoxy on TiO2 and Effect of Adsorbed Water on the Rates of Formate and Formic Acid Photooxidation — Research Paper | ScholarLens