A Conceptual Outline of Contemporary Magic Practice
Charles Rolfe
Abstract
Charles Rolfe
Abstract
This paper offers a conceptual outline of contemporary magic practice that is applicable to magic performed, experienced, and commercialized as a form of entertainment. Magic is defined within a paradoxical dialectics of art and (the nonart of) work. Jacques Rancière's ideas are used to conceive magic as (1) art: where magic is based around dissemblance (operations which alter the given) and theatrical spectacle (drama before an audience); and (2) work: where magic is embodied in the figure of the magician, which knots together ways of doing (practical knowledge; potentialities) and thinking (genealogical; teleological) in order to produce an effect of impossibility and the affect of astonishment. The paper concludes by making an argument for how theorizing magic requires thinking about and expressing paradoxical situations given that magic is enigmatic.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper offers a conceptual outline of contemporary magic practice that is applicable to magic performed, experienced, and commercialized as a form of entertainment. Magic is defined within a paradoxical dialectics of art and (the nonart of) work. Jacques Rancière's ideas are used to conceive magic as (1) art: where magic is based around dissemblance (operations which alter the given) and theatrical spectacle (drama before an audience); and (2) work: where magic is embodied in the figure of the magician, which knots together ways of doing (practical knowledge; potentialities) and thinking (genealogical; teleological) in order to produce an effect of impossibility and the affect of astonishment. The paper concludes by making an argument for how theorizing magic requires thinking about and expressing paradoxical situations given that magic is enigmatic.
Key concepts: MAGIC (telescope), Impossibility, Spectacle, Dialectic, Aesthetics, Teleology, Epistemology, Embodied cognition