2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Crucial Differences between Commercial and Military Communications Technology Needs: Why the Military Still Needs Its Own Research

Marius S. Vassiliou, Jonathan R. Agre, Syed Hashim Ali Shah, T.G. Macdonald

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Military establishments constitute a relatively much smaller part of the wireless communications market than they once did, and the commercial sector is now a primary driver of communications technology development. However, there are crucial differences between military and commercial communications needs, especially at the tactical edge. First, commercial wireless services depend on a well-maintained and reliable infrastructure, whereas military operations may require communications between mobile platforms and command posts in areas without such an infrastructure. Second, military communications tend to involve multihop networks, and the theoretical foundations of such networks are not as well established as those involving single pairwise links. Third, military communications can involve multiple heterogeneous networks operating in the same area. While commercial networks can also be heterogeneous, commercial systems do not need to deal with the same extent of temporal and spatial variability. Connecting across heterogeneous networks in a dynamic environment remains a significant challenge. Fourth, military systems must also deal with highly complex and contested electromagnetic environments. They must confront adversarial action such as jamming and electronic warfare, as well as the benign complexity arising from the proliferation of computers, sensors, and radios. They must deal with low and intermittent bandwidth. They must also contend with the continuing loss of spectrum previously dedicated to military use. If we combine all these factors with the more commonly observed ones such as the need for ruggedness, security, and stealth, we see that much research and development, unlikely to be undertaken by the commercial sector, is still needed in the area of military communications. While military establishments can and do make use of commercial technology, they will continue to require purpose-driven research and development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Military establishments constitute a relatively much smaller part of the wireless communications market than they once did, and the commercial sector is now a primary driver of communications technology development. However, there are crucial differences between military and commercial communications needs, especially at the tactical edge. First, commercial wireless services depend on a well-maintained and reliable infrastructure, whereas military operations may require communications between mobile platforms and command posts in areas without such an infrastructure. Second, military communications tend to involve multihop networks, and the theoretical foundations of such networks are not as well established as those involving single pairwise links. Third, military communications can involve multiple heterogeneous networks operating in the same area. While commercial networks can also be heterogeneous, commercial systems do not need to deal with the same extent of temporal and spatial variability. Connecting across heterogeneous networks in a dynamic environment remains a significant challenge. Fourth, military systems must also deal with highly complex and contested electromagnetic environments. They must confront adversarial action such as jamming and electronic warfare, as well as the benign complexity arising from the proliferation of computers, sensors, and radios. They must deal with low and intermittent bandwidth. They must also contend with the continuing loss of spectrum previously dedicated to military use. If we combine all these factors with the more commonly observed ones such as the need for ruggedness, security, and stealth, we see that much research and development, unlikely to be undertaken by the commercial sector, is still needed in the area of military communications. While military establishments can and do make use of commercial technology, they will continue to require purpose-driven research and development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Military establishments constitute a relatively much smaller part of the wireless communications market than they once did, and the commercial sector is now a primary driver of communications technology development. However, there are crucial differences between military and commercial communications needs, especially at the tactical edge. First, commercial wireless services depend on a well-maintained and reliable infrastructure, whereas military operations may require communications between mobile platforms and command posts in areas without such an infrastructure. Second, military communications tend to involve multihop networks, and the theoretical foundations of such networks are not as well established as those involving single pairwise links. Third, military communications can involve multiple heterogeneous networks operating in the same area. While commercial networks can also be heterogeneous, commercial systems do not need to deal with the same extent of temporal and spatial variability. Connecting across heterogeneous networks in a dynamic environment remains a significant challenge. Fourth, military systems must also deal with highly complex and contested electromagnetic environments. They must confront adversarial action such as jamming and electronic warfare, as well as the benign complexity arising from the proliferation of computers, sensors, and radios. They must deal with low and intermittent bandwidth. They must also contend with the continuing loss of spectrum previously dedicated to military use. If we combine all these factors with the more commonly observed ones such as the need for ruggedness, security, and stealth, we see that much research and development, unlikely to be undertaken by the commercial sector, is still needed in the area of military communications. While military establishments can and do make use of commercial technology, they will continue to require purpose-driven research and development.

Key concepts: Military communications, Tactical communications, Telecommunications, Electronic warfare, Computer security, Adversarial system, Wireless, Jamming

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crucial Differences between Commercial and Military Communications Technology Needs: Why the Military Still Needs Its Own Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens