Topography-Guided vs Wavefront-Optimized Surface Ablation for Myopia Using the WaveLight Platform: A Contralateral Eye Study
Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani, Masih Hashemi, Mehdi Modarres, Mostafa Soltan Sanjari, Niloufar Darvish, Arzhang Gordiz
Abstract
Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani, Masih Hashemi, Mehdi Modarres, Mostafa Soltan Sanjari, Niloufar Darvish, Arzhang Gordiz
Abstract
PURPOSE: to compare treatments with wavefront-optimized and topography-guided ablations. METHODS: this prospective, randomized, contralateral study comprised 40 eyes (20 patients) with low to moderate myopia with or without astigmatism that underwent topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (ALLEGRO Topolyzer, Alcon Laboratories Inc) in one eye and wavefront-optimized PRK (ALLEGRETTO WAVE software version 2.020 default treatment, Alcon Laboratories Inc) in the fellow eye. Visual acuity, refractive error, contrast sensitivity, and Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb) 3- and 5-mm corneal irregularities were measured preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The results were compared between the two eyes. RESULTS: in both groups, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.03±0.09 logMAR for topography-guided and 0.01 ± 0.06 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.1]), 3-month postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (-0.0 1± 0.03 logMAR for topography-guided and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.4]), and 6-month postoperative UDVA (0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for topography-guided and 0.0 ± 0.01 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.3]) were the same. All wavefront-optimized and 18 (90%) topography-guided eyes had UDVA of 20/20 or better. No significant differences were noted between groups in pre- and postoperative spherical and cylindrical refractive errors or corneal irregularity and contrast sensitivity measurements. Six months postoperatively, contrast sensitivity values at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree were 5.7 ± 0.7, 6.0 ± 1.5, 6.1 ± 1.3, and 5.5 ± 1.5, respectively, in the topography-guided group, and 6.2 ± 0.6, 6.4 ±1.2, 6.4 ± 1.1, and 5.8 ± 1.3, respectively, in the wavefront-optimized group (P=.3, P=.5, P=.4, and P=.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: using the WaveLight excimer laser platform for PRK, CDVA and contrast sensitivity outcomes were statistically similar between the wavefront-optimized and topography-guided ablations in eyes with low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism.
OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: to compare treatments with wavefront-optimized and topography-guided ablations. METHODS: this prospective, randomized, contralateral study comprised 40 eyes (20 patients) with low to moderate myopia with or without astigmatism that underwent topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (ALLEGRO Topolyzer, Alcon Laboratories Inc) in one eye and wavefront-optimized PRK (ALLEGRETTO WAVE software version 2.020 default treatment, Alcon Laboratories Inc) in the fellow eye. Visual acuity, refractive error, contrast sensitivity, and Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb) 3- and 5-mm corneal irregularities were measured preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The results were compared between the two eyes. RESULTS: in both groups, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.03±0.09 logMAR for topography-guided and 0.01 ± 0.06 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.1]), 3-month postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (-0.0 1± 0.03 logMAR for topography-guided and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.4]), and 6-month postoperative UDVA (0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for topography-guided and 0.0 ± 0.01 logMAR for wavefront-optimized [P=.3]) were the same. All wavefront-optimized and 18 (90%) topography-guided eyes had UDVA of 20/20 or better. No significant differences were noted between groups in pre- and postoperative spherical and cylindrical refractive errors or corneal irregularity and contrast sensitivity measurements. Six months postoperatively, contrast sensitivity values at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree were 5.7 ± 0.7, 6.0 ± 1.5, 6.1 ± 1.3, and 5.5 ± 1.5, respectively, in the topography-guided group, and 6.2 ± 0.6, 6.4 ±1.2, 6.4 ± 1.1, and 5.8 ± 1.3, respectively, in the wavefront-optimized group (P=.3, P=.5, P=.4, and P=.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: using the WaveLight excimer laser platform for PRK, CDVA and contrast sensitivity outcomes were statistically similar between the wavefront-optimized and topography-guided ablations in eyes with low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism.
Key concepts: Medicine, Ophthalmology, Photorefractive keratectomy, Corneal topography, Contrast (vision), Wavefront, Visual acuity, Astigmatism