2019Yanwaishang zhiye yanbing zazhiRequires access

Efficacy of astigmatism correction after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

Huan Lyu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of astigmatism correction after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). Methods The data of 64 eyes of 32 cases with myopic astigmatism from May 2017 to Feb. 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. They received transPRK and followed up for 3 months. All patients were divided into 2 groups, low astigmatism group, 43 eyes with -0.25D--0.75 D, and medium to high astigmatism group, 21 eyes with 1.00D--2.75D. The diopter parameters were collected before and 3 months after transPRK. Postoperative astigmatism related vector parameters were compared between the two groups with standard vector analysis. Results The difference in absolute value of error of angle (t=2.547, P=0.014), correction ratio (t=2.117, P=0.039) and error ratio (t=3.679, P=0.001) were statistically significant between the two groups after operation. There was a positive correlation between overall error rate and intended refractive correction (r=0.339, P<0.01), but there was no significant correlation between correction rate and intended refractive correction. Conclusion The outcome of astigmatism correction after transPRK is closely related to the degree of astigmatism before surgery. It is necessary to adjust the target value of astigmatism correction and exclude other factors that affect astigmatism correction in clinical practice. Key words: Analysis, vector; Keratectomy, transepithelial, photorefractive; Astigmatism; Myopia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of astigmatism correction after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). Methods The data of 64 eyes of 32 cases with myopic astigmatism from May 2017 to Feb. 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. They received transPRK and followed up for 3 months. All patients were divided into 2 groups, low astigmatism group, 43 eyes with -0.25D--0.75 D, and medium to high astigmatism group, 21 eyes with 1.00D--2.75D. The diopter parameters were collected before and 3 months after transPRK. Postoperative astigmatism related vector parameters were compared between the two groups with standard vector analysis. Results The difference in absolute value of error of angle (t=2.547, P=0.014), correction ratio (t=2.117, P=0.039) and error ratio (t=3.679, P=0.001) were statistically significant between the two groups after operation. There was a positive correlation between overall error rate and intended refractive correction (r=0.339, P<0.01), but there was no significant correlation between correction rate and intended refractive correction. Conclusion The outcome of astigmatism correction after transPRK is closely related to the degree of astigmatism before surgery. It is necessary to adjust the target value of astigmatism correction and exclude other factors that affect astigmatism correction in clinical practice. Key words: Analysis, vector; Keratectomy, transepithelial, photorefractive; Astigmatism; Myopia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of astigmatism correction after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). Methods The data of 64 eyes of 32 cases with myopic astigmatism from May 2017 to Feb. 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. They received transPRK and followed up for 3 months. All patients were divided into 2 groups, low astigmatism group, 43 eyes with -0.25D--0.75 D, and medium to high astigmatism group, 21 eyes with 1.00D--2.75D. The diopter parameters were collected before and 3 months after transPRK. Postoperative astigmatism related vector parameters were compared between the two groups with standard vector analysis. Results The difference in absolute value of error of angle (t=2.547, P=0.014), correction ratio (t=2.117, P=0.039) and error ratio (t=3.679, P=0.001) were statistically significant between the two groups after operation. There was a positive correlation between overall error rate and intended refractive correction (r=0.339, P<0.01), but there was no significant correlation between correction rate and intended refractive correction. Conclusion The outcome of astigmatism correction after transPRK is closely related to the degree of astigmatism before surgery. It is necessary to adjust the target value of astigmatism correction and exclude other factors that affect astigmatism correction in clinical practice. Key words: Analysis, vector; Keratectomy, transepithelial, photorefractive; Astigmatism; Myopia

Key concepts: Photorefractive keratectomy, Astigmatism, Dioptre, Refractive error, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Eye disease, Cornea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of astigmatism correction after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens