It is Time for Universal Access, Not Universal Insurance
James S. Todd
Abstract
James S. Todd
Abstract
An editorial by Relman proclaims, "Universal Health Insurance: Its Time Has Come."1 Other recent Journal articles recommend various consumerchoice health care systems,2 , 3 and the report of the National Leadership Commission on Health Care proposes what is essentially a national health insurance scheme.4 I submit, instead, that the idea whose time has come is universal access to care — not through universal insurance that is funded from a central source or tightly controlled by forces other than medical need, but through a pluralistic delivery system.Universal health insurance is not a good idea. To control goods or services through a single . . .
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An editorial by Relman proclaims, "Universal Health Insurance: Its Time Has Come."1 Other recent Journal articles recommend various consumerchoice health care systems,2 , 3 and the report of the National Leadership Commission on Health Care proposes what is essentially a national health insurance scheme.4 I submit, instead, that the idea whose time has come is universal access to care — not through universal insurance that is funded from a central source or tightly controlled by forces other than medical need, but through a pluralistic delivery system.Universal health insurance is not a good idea. To control goods or services through a single . . .
Key concepts: Universal health care, Universal coverage, Universal design, Commission, Health care, Self-insurance, Medicine, Health insurance