2001New Journal of ChemistryRequires access

Interaction of trivalent lanthanide cations with nitrate anions: a quantum chemical investigation of monodentate/bidentate binding modes

Marc Dobler, Philippe Guilbaud, Alain Dedieu, Georges Wipff

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

We report ab initio quantum mechanical calculations on LnIII(NO3−)n (n = 1–3) and Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m (m = 4–6) complexes to compare the monodentate s. bidentate binding mode of nitrate anions to trivalent lanthanide cations (LaIII, EuIII and LuIII) in the gas phase. In all LnIII(NO3−)n complexes studied, bidentate coordination is preferred (by about 30 kcal mol−1 for n = 1 and 20 kcal mol−1 for n = 3). In the Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m aggregates, however, where the first coordination shell is saturated, the two types of binding modes become of similar energy, leading to different coordination numbers (CNs) and distributions of first and second shell water molecules. For instance, for La(NO3)3(H2O)6, CN ranges from 9 (3 monodentate nitrates + 6 water) to 10 (3 bidentate nitrates + 4 water) or 11 (3 bidentate nitrates + 5 water). Thus, at some point, adding water to the second or to the first shell becomes isoenergetic. As the cation becomes smaller, the preference for monodentate nitrate binding increases, due to avoided repulsions in the first coordination sphere. Thus, water coordination to the lanthanide cations may induce a change of anion coordination mode and of coordination number. The fact that in solid state structures bidentate binding is dominant thus does not result from a marked intrinsic preference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report ab initio quantum mechanical calculations on LnIII(NO3−)n (n = 1–3) and Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m (m = 4–6) complexes to compare the monodentate s. bidentate binding mode of nitrate anions to trivalent lanthanide cations (LaIII, EuIII and LuIII) in the gas phase. In all LnIII(NO3−)n complexes studied, bidentate coordination is preferred (by about 30 kcal mol−1 for n = 1 and 20 kcal mol−1 for n = 3). In the Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m aggregates, however, where the first coordination shell is saturated, the two types of binding modes become of similar energy, leading to different coordination numbers (CNs) and distributions of first and second shell water molecules. For instance, for La(NO3)3(H2O)6, CN ranges from 9 (3 monodentate nitrates + 6 water) to 10 (3 bidentate nitrates + 4 water) or 11 (3 bidentate nitrates + 5 water). Thus, at some point, adding water to the second or to the first shell becomes isoenergetic. As the cation becomes smaller, the preference for monodentate nitrate binding increases, due to avoided repulsions in the first coordination sphere. Thus, water coordination to the lanthanide cations may induce a change of anion coordination mode and of coordination number. The fact that in solid state structures bidentate binding is dominant thus does not result from a marked intrinsic preference.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report ab initio quantum mechanical calculations on LnIII(NO3−)n (n = 1–3) and Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m (m = 4–6) complexes to compare the monodentate s. bidentate binding mode of nitrate anions to trivalent lanthanide cations (LaIII, EuIII and LuIII) in the gas phase. In all LnIII(NO3−)n complexes studied, bidentate coordination is preferred (by about 30 kcal mol−1 for n = 1 and 20 kcal mol−1 for n = 3). In the Ln(NO3)3(H2O)m aggregates, however, where the first coordination shell is saturated, the two types of binding modes become of similar energy, leading to different coordination numbers (CNs) and distributions of first and second shell water molecules. For instance, for La(NO3)3(H2O)6, CN ranges from 9 (3 monodentate nitrates + 6 water) to 10 (3 bidentate nitrates + 4 water) or 11 (3 bidentate nitrates + 5 water). Thus, at some point, adding water to the second or to the first shell becomes isoenergetic. As the cation becomes smaller, the preference for monodentate nitrate binding increases, due to avoided repulsions in the first coordination sphere. Thus, water coordination to the lanthanide cations may induce a change of anion coordination mode and of coordination number. The fact that in solid state structures bidentate binding is dominant thus does not result from a marked intrinsic preference.

Key concepts: Denticity, Chemistry, Lanthanide, Coordination sphere, Coordination number, Crystallography, Molecule, Nitrate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaction of trivalent lanthanide cations with nitrate anions: a quantum chemical investigation of monodentate/bidentate binding modes — Research Paper | ScholarLens