2007•International Journal of Logistics Systems and ManagementRequires access

Comparative study on decentralised inventory policy and Vendor Managed Inventory with (r, Q) replenishment strategy

Airong Zhang, Zigang Zhang, Xiang Guo

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Recently, Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) has emerged as a significant development towards collaboration in supply chain management. This paper develops a model to compare the performance of VMI with the performance of decentralised inventory policy. A two-member (vendor and buyer) system implementing (r, Q) replenishment strategy with multi-period, uncertain and price-sensitive customer demand is considered. We find that under a certain cost condition, although VMI likely reduces the vendor's profit, it, compared with decentralised inventory policy, will decrease the retail price and consequently brings higher expected profit level for the buyer and the whole supply chain. However, if the cost condition is not satisfied, VMI will result in a higher retail price, possibly lead a lower expected profit for vendor and not necessarily lead to a higher expected profit for the buyer or the whole supply chain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently, Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) has emerged as a significant development towards collaboration in supply chain management. This paper develops a model to compare the performance of VMI with the performance of decentralised inventory policy. A two-member (vendor and buyer) system implementing (r, Q) replenishment strategy with multi-period, uncertain and price-sensitive customer demand is considered. We find that under a certain cost condition, although VMI likely reduces the vendor's profit, it, compared with decentralised inventory policy, will decrease the retail price and consequently brings higher expected profit level for the buyer and the whole supply chain. However, if the cost condition is not satisfied, VMI will result in a higher retail price, possibly lead a lower expected profit for vendor and not necessarily lead to a higher expected profit for the buyer or the whole supply chain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently, Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) has emerged as a significant development towards collaboration in supply chain management. This paper develops a model to compare the performance of VMI with the performance of decentralised inventory policy. A two-member (vendor and buyer) system implementing (r, Q) replenishment strategy with multi-period, uncertain and price-sensitive customer demand is considered. We find that under a certain cost condition, although VMI likely reduces the vendor's profit, it, compared with decentralised inventory policy, will decrease the retail price and consequently brings higher expected profit level for the buyer and the whole supply chain. However, if the cost condition is not satisfied, VMI will result in a higher retail price, possibly lead a lower expected profit for vendor and not necessarily lead to a higher expected profit for the buyer or the whole supply chain.

Key concepts: Vendor-managed inventory, Vendor, Supply chain, Business, Profit (economics), Lead time, Inventory management, Inventory cost

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on decentralised inventory policy and Vendor Managed Inventory with (r, Q) replenishment strategy — Research Paper | ScholarLens