2009ElectroanalysisOpen access

Quantitative Analysis of Prometrine Herbicide by Liquid–Liquid Extraction Procedures Coupled to Electrochemical Measurements

Andrea V. Juárez, L.M. Yudi

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract A sensitive method is proposed for the preconcentration and quantification of the herbicide Prometrine (PROM) at a liquid‐liquid interface employing square‐wave voltammetry. The preconcentration stage was based on liquid‐liquid extraction methodology and the PROM quantification was carried out from the peak current of square‐wave voltammograms. Under the experimental conditions employed, linear calibration curves in the concentration range 1.0×10−6 M–5.0×10−5 M, with detection limit equal to 1.5×10−6 M were obtained without pretreatment of the samples. This linear range, as well as detection limit could be extended towards lower concentrations when a pretreatment procedure was employed. In this way, linearity of calibration curves between 8.0×10−8 M and 2.4×10−7 M and detection limit of 1.0×10−7 M, were observed. On the other hand, the standard addition method was also used as an alternative and an appropriated quantification technique for this system. A linear concentration range between 1.0×10−6 M and 2.7×10−5 M, with a correlation coefficient of 0.997, was obtained. This procedure has also a promising application in the separation of herbicides from other interferents, present in real samples, previous to their quantification.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A sensitive method is proposed for the preconcentration and quantification of the herbicide Prometrine (PROM) at a liquid‐liquid interface employing square‐wave voltammetry. The preconcentration stage was based on liquid‐liquid extraction methodology and the PROM quantification was carried out from the peak current of square‐wave voltammograms. Under the experimental conditions employed, linear calibration curves in the concentration range 1.0×10−6 M–5.0×10−5 M, with detection limit equal to 1.5×10−6 M were obtained without pretreatment of the samples. This linear range, as well as detection limit could be extended towards lower concentrations when a pretreatment procedure was employed. In this way, linearity of calibration curves between 8.0×10−8 M and 2.4×10−7 M and detection limit of 1.0×10−7 M, were observed. On the other hand, the standard addition method was also used as an alternative and an appropriated quantification technique for this system. A linear concentration range between 1.0×10−6 M and 2.7×10−5 M, with a correlation coefficient of 0.997, was obtained. This procedure has also a promising application in the separation of herbicides from other interferents, present in real samples, previous to their quantification.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A sensitive method is proposed for the preconcentration and quantification of the herbicide Prometrine (PROM) at a liquid‐liquid interface employing square‐wave voltammetry. The preconcentration stage was based on liquid‐liquid extraction methodology and the PROM quantification was carried out from the peak current of square‐wave voltammograms. Under the experimental conditions employed, linear calibration curves in the concentration range 1.0×10−6 M–5.0×10−5 M, with detection limit equal to 1.5×10−6 M were obtained without pretreatment of the samples. This linear range, as well as detection limit could be extended towards lower concentrations when a pretreatment procedure was employed. In this way, linearity of calibration curves between 8.0×10−8 M and 2.4×10−7 M and detection limit of 1.0×10−7 M, were observed. On the other hand, the standard addition method was also used as an alternative and an appropriated quantification technique for this system. A linear concentration range between 1.0×10−6 M and 2.7×10−5 M, with a correlation coefficient of 0.997, was obtained. This procedure has also a promising application in the separation of herbicides from other interferents, present in real samples, previous to their quantification.

Key concepts: Detection limit, Calibration curve, Square wave, Chromatography, Extraction (chemistry), Linearity, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Correlation coefficient

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative Analysis of Prometrine Herbicide by Liquid–Liquid Extraction Procedures Coupled to Electrochemical Measurements — Research Paper | ScholarLens